Tenant #2970
Merged
Tenant #2970
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request includes significant updates to the database schema and Java classes within the Changes
Possibly related issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
审核指南由 Sourcery 提供此 PR 在代码库中将术语从 'sourceName' 更改为 'sourcePrefix'，以更好地反映其作为数据源标识前缀的目的。更改包括重命名变量、方法和数据库列，同时保持现有功能。 更新的 boot_domain_event 表的 ER 图erDiagram
boot_domain_event {
int8 aggregate_id
varchar event_type
varchar topic
varchar source_prefix
json attribute
varchar service_id
varchar tag
}
更新的 UserDetail 类图classDiagram
class UserDetail {
- Long tenantId
- String sourcePrefix
+ UserDetail()
+ UserDetail(Long id, String username, String password, String avatar, Integer superAdmin, Integer status, String mail, String mobile, Set<String> deptPaths, Set<String> permissions, Long tenantId, String sourcePrefix)
+ boolean equals(Object o)
+ int hashCode()
}
文件级更改
提示和命令与 Sourcery 互动
自定义您的体验访问您的仪表板以：
获取帮助Original review guide in EnglishReviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR implements a terminology change from 'sourceName' to 'sourcePrefix' across the codebase to better reflect its purpose as a prefix for data source identification. The change includes renaming variables, methods, and database columns while maintaining the existing functionality. Updated ER diagram for boot_domain_event tableerDiagram
boot_domain_event {
int8 aggregate_id
varchar event_type
varchar topic
varchar source_prefix
json attribute
varchar service_id
varchar tag
}
Updated class diagram for UserDetailclassDiagram
class UserDetail {
- Long tenantId
- String sourcePrefix
+ UserDetail()
+ UserDetail(Long id, String username, String password, String avatar, Integer superAdmin, Integer status, String mail, String mobile, Set<String> deptPaths, Set<String> permissions, Long tenantId, String sourcePrefix)
+ boolean equals(Object o)
+ int hashCode()
}
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
嘿 @KouShenhai - 我已经审查了你的更改 - 这里有一些反馈：
总体评论：
- 在 SourceGatewayImpl.getPrefix() 中，你仍然返回 sourceDO.getName()，这似乎与前缀重命名模式不一致。这里应该返回一个前缀值吗？
这是我在审查期间查看的内容
- 🟢 一般问题：一切看起来都很好
- 🟢 安全性：一切看起来都很好
- 🟢 测试：一切看起来都很好
- 🟢 复杂性：一切看起来都很好
- 🟢 文档：一切看起来都很好
帮助我变得更有用！请在每条评论上点击 👍 或 👎，我将使用反馈来改进你的评论。
Original comment in English
Hey @KouShenhai - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- In SourceGatewayImpl.getPrefix(), you're still returning sourceDO.getName() which seems inconsistent with the prefix renaming pattern. Should this be returning a prefix value instead?
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2970 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 16.68% 16.68%
Complexity 74 74
=========================================
Files 89 89
Lines 1456 1456
Branches 111 111
=========================================
Hits 243 243
Misses 1184 1184
Partials 29 29 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by Sourcery
增强功能：
Original summary in English
Summary by Sourcery
Enhancements:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation