-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Technique advancements #27
Comments
will read later :) |
As I read the strategy, it is based on the assumption that there should be a probability higher 50% that a win follows on a lose. This is not true, as the next random number doesn't depend on the random number before. The graph shows - in short - how the system is used, is that correct? I'm sure it could be implemented, as for now it does not make sense for me. Your opinion? |
nakowa's strategy will not make you win another million dollar. He's playing bold and with some luck winning a bit more than losing. If anyone would like to risk that much(nakowa win lost ~4000BTC) and stay calm to play on despite the huge losts and wins, he would deserve the fortune. Maybe it's a gambler's fallcy that thinking a hi following a lo, but I think it significantly stop the game losing too much rounds in a row. So, instead of let the bot choose hi or lo randomly, maybe it's better to use the output of last bet's number to guess to bet on hi or lo, ie. if the lucky number is already 5 times below 49.5, I would like to bet hi. This would be called the "rolling strategy". rolling strategy suggestion: For comparison, the martingale strategy would be called a betting strategy. |
Thanks for your explanations, I'll implement a configurable hi/lo betting. I think of options for random|always-hi|always-lo|rolling. To make the rolling strategy configurable: do you have links explaining how that works exactly? That would be a great addition I think. |
On the rolling strategy: On the strategy math: I think the math works but don't know how to apply to just-dice rolling guess. |
P.S. With a good rolling strategy, one can have a good luck more than 100% ( shows in the stats tab on just-dice.com, don't know how just-dice calculate the luck, I have a 102.72% for 500 rounds on a new account ). Only with a good rolling strategy so that to overcome the 1% house edge. So, hoping to implement the rolling strategy and simulate it using the bot. |
Thanks for the links, They do not state anything about two or more randoms in a row as I see. Anyhow: I think letting the user choose the strategy would be smart, so I'll implement some options here :) Check back soon and think about some test BTC (or beer) in the meanwhile: 1CDjWb7zupTfQihc6sMeDvPmUHkfeMhC83 Thanks :) |
With hand played for 2000 round and my luck drop to 96.83% ;-( |
Did u use the bot and if: what config? Thanks for the tip! |
I just implemented a new config option:
you see there is no rolling for now, as it will need more work. I need to read the last lucky number (and I'll read some more values to fix #14) and make the bet history available. Then the bot will get some variants of "rolling" modes. The current changes aren't commited right now, I've to test them first :) |
Feature request mameise on bitcointalk.org:
|
implemented in next version.
|
* option to chose hi/lo-strategy, always hi or low, or random #27 * view page title on reconnect, to better understand disconnects * option to wait number of losses before starting strategy (0.00000001 bets) * fix get_rounded_bet, was ceiling more often than necessary on low chance bets
'rolling' modes will be implemented in 'Barbudi' release. I'll keep that open for that request. |
Here is a note from Nakowa to the owner of Just-Dice on his strategy that won him 1.3m USD:
http://plaxant.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Dt6AJaB.png
and the article it's from:
http://plaxant.com/just-dices-international-whale-watching/
What do you think of this? Is there a way to incorporate these ideas into the bot?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: