Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For now disable upstream's debug info stripping. #142

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jerboaa
Copy link
Collaborator

@jerboaa jerboaa commented Feb 17, 2023

This avoids trying to add a debuglink to the resulting binary twice which then fails the CRC check when reading the debuginfo.

Closes #138

This avoids trying to add a debuglink to the resulting binary
twice which then fails the CRC check when reading the debuginfo.

Closes Karm#138
@jerboaa jerboaa requested review from Karm and zakkak February 17, 2023 17:18
@jerboaa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jerboaa commented Feb 17, 2023

We should create a quarkus issue which deals with this as well. Right now, I'm leaning towards keeping the quarkus approach until upstream is properly fixed (it should use relative paths for links).

@zakkak
Copy link
Collaborator

zakkak commented Feb 18, 2023

We should create a quarkus issue which deals with this as well.

quarkusio/quarkus#31258

I am personally against merging this (i.e. working around the issue in the test suite). I think we should directly fix it upstream by keeping the quarkus approach at least for the time being (I can prepare the PR on Monday). In the long run it might be good to adopt the GraalVM approach for consistency.

@Karm
Copy link
Owner

Karm commented Feb 20, 2023

Could we leave it failing for now? Or is it too much noise?

@jerboaa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jerboaa commented Feb 20, 2023

Could we leave it failing for now? Or is it too much noise?

It is too much noise. We keep missing failures. But if a quarkus fix is about to land, that's good too. Otherwise, we should land it, then revert once a quarkus fix is in.

@zakkak
Copy link
Collaborator

zakkak commented Feb 20, 2023

I am on it :)

Update: quarkusio/quarkus#31294

@jerboaa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jerboaa commented Feb 21, 2023

quarkusio/quarkus#31294 fixes this on the quarkus side. Withdrawing this one.

@jerboaa jerboaa closed this Feb 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

debugSymbolsQuarkus fails with latest GraalVM master
3 participants