Drop support under Julia v1.6

[hyrodium]

Julia v1.6 is the new LTS, and v1.0 is no longer maintained. This PR replaces v1.0 with v1.6.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2215647081

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 1333249280:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	0
Relevant Lines:	0

---

💛 - Coveralls

[devmotion]

There is no need to drop support just because a new LTS was released. Many packages still support older Julia versions. IMO dropping of Julia < 1.6 should only be done if it blocks development or increases code complexity and/or maintenance burden unreasonable. I don't think this is the case here, hence I'll close this PR.

[hyrodium]

IMO dropping of Julia < 1.6 should only be done if it blocks development or increases code complexity and/or maintenance burden unreasonable.

I opened this PR because of this test failure on #14 : https://github.com/JuliaMath/IrrationalConstants.jl/runs/6146750074?check_suite_focus=true

I think we need to add testing on Julia v1.6 in any cases.

[devmotion]

I think we need to add testing on Julia v1.6 in any cases.

Yes, that we should definitely do. IMO we should test at least the oldest supported version, LTS, and the current stable version.

[hyrodium]

Yes, that we should definitely do.

Should we reopen this PR, or should I make a new PR?

[devmotion]

I think a separate PR is cleaner, I opened #16.

[hyrodium]

@JeffreySarnoff Could you reopen this PR? I'll resolve the conflicts. (x-ref #14 (comment))

[devmotion]

I still don't see why we would want to do this - the package works just fine with Julia 1.0. As said above, currently I don't think there's any reason to drop support for Julia 1.0 as there are no issues from our side and there is no specific maintenance needed for Julia 1.0.

[JeffreySarnoff]

@hyrodium given ^, no need ..