Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix field types of Method type #22743

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2017
Merged

fix field types of Method type #22743

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2017

Conversation

JeffBezanson
Copy link
Member

This is...bad. Possibly crept in during a rebase at some point; also in 0.6.

@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson added backport pending 0.6 bugfix This change fixes an existing bug labels Jul 10, 2017
Copy link
Contributor

@yuyichao yuyichao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ooops.

@ararslan
Copy link
Member

Is this something that can be tested to ensure it doesn't get reintroduced at some point?

@yuyichao
Copy link
Contributor

Not really through a test. It is in principle possible to generate this function from the C header (or let both be generated) but it's very non-trivial to generate the bootstrap sequence automatically (especially since we can't do that with a julia script).

@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson merged commit 267cc44 into master Jul 11, 2017
@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson deleted the jb/Method_fieldtypes branch July 11, 2017 04:07
ararslan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2017
fix field types of Method type

Ref #22742
(cherry picked from commit 267cc44)
ararslan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2017
Ref #22743
(cherry picked from commit 93531aa)
vtjnash pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2017
Ref #22743
(cherry picked from commit 93531aa)
ararslan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2017
Ref #22743
(cherry picked from commit 93531aa)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bugfix This change fixes an existing bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants