Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate StatsBase #135

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 10, 2020
Merged

Deprecate StatsBase #135

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 10, 2020

Conversation

timholy
Copy link
Member

@timholy timholy commented Sep 9, 2020

I think we've decided that depwarns aren't breaking, so before #131 lands let's deprecate StatsBase. Given that we now have strong [compat] bounds and we've been encouraging people to shift away from imhist for a long time, perhaps we don't need to leave that deprecation in place for very long.

This also marks one test as broken, ref #134.

@kimikage
Copy link
Collaborator

kimikage commented Sep 9, 2020

See also PR #132 on CI. (It's optional, though.)
I don't have the permission to merge in this repository.

@timholy
Copy link
Member Author

timholy commented Sep 9, 2020

I'd be fine to switch, I just wasn't sure whether that was ready yet.

@johnnychen94
Copy link
Member

johnnychen94 commented Sep 10, 2020

Rebased locally and checked that #132 works with this branch. I think #132 is ready as it doesn't change the actual codes in ColorVectorSpaces. It won't be too difficult to merge whichever first and resolve the conflicts.

@timholy
Copy link
Member Author

timholy commented Sep 10, 2020

I'm probably going to need some help here...not very familiar with GitHubActions yet.

@johnnychen94
Copy link
Member

Sorry! it is a typo in #132 and get fixed in 42a9bf7

@timholy timholy merged commit 208bc7e into master Sep 10, 2020
@timholy timholy deleted the teh/deprecate_statsbase branch September 10, 2020 10:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants