Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Memory #64

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 13, 2020
Merged

Memory #64

merged 7 commits into from
May 13, 2020

Conversation

jvaara
Copy link
Member

@jvaara jvaara commented May 11, 2020

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 11, 2020

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-2.8%) to 70.149% when pulling 7deec74 on memory into 3785340 on master.

@jvaara
Copy link
Member Author

jvaara commented May 11, 2020

The memory surface proved to be surprisingly difficult to get to converge. See the commit 7731a5b for the uncleaned code what was attempted. Eventually, an explicit update on the memory surface variables proved to be quite robust but may cause problems in fitting the model.

@jvaara
Copy link
Member Author

jvaara commented May 11, 2020

The test produces this kind of behavior. First strain amplitudes 0.3%, 0.5% and 0.7% are driven to show each amplitude saturates to unique isotropic hardening value. Then the strain amplitude is dropped back to 0.3% to see the memory-evanescence eventually return the hardening back to the initial saturation values.
image

test/test_memory.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jvaara jvaara merged commit da04332 into master May 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants