-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Tridiagonal construction rule #758
Conversation
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Frames White <[email protected]>
If tests pass (I know one of our CIs is broken for unzip) merge and tag (minor)!when happy. |
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Frames White <[email protected]>
Is there a minimal example of what problem this solves? There is some chance that it would be fixed by JuliaDiff/ChainRulesCore.jl#446 , which is really part of the original idea of ProjectTo. |
Not fixed just hit it here https://github.com/SciML/DiffEqFlux.jl/actions/runs/9115130596/job/25060691159?pr=922 |
Once JuliaDiff/FiniteDifferences.jl#237 |
What is the current status for this? |
Merged. |
Fixes SciML/DiffEqFlux.jl#744