You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If a user has a dims tuple we currently have 3 different ways to call nextfastfft defined here:
nextfastfft(dims)
nextfastfft(dims...)
nextfastfft.(dims)
In general this sort of automatic collection handling has been getting deprecated in favor of having the caller use broadcasting (option 3 above). I propose we deprecate the first 2.
It's possible that the multi-arg version (nextfastfft(x, y)) is useful, but I don't think that we as a general policy expand other single-arg functions in this way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If a user has a
dims
tuple we currently have 3 different ways to callnextfastfft
defined here:nextfastfft(dims)
nextfastfft(dims...)
nextfastfft.(dims)
In general this sort of automatic collection handling has been getting deprecated in favor of having the caller use broadcasting (option 3 above). I propose we deprecate the first 2.
It's possible that the multi-arg version (
nextfastfft(x, y)
) is useful, but I don't think that we as a general policy expand other single-arg functions in this way.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: