-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bump mbed_tls version to 0.7 #97
Conversation
bors try |
97: bump mbed_tls version to 0.7 r=mattBrzezinski a=SebRollen Hi, The discussion in a recent discourse thread (and [this post](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/please-be-mindful-of-version-bounds-and-semantic-versioning-when-tagging-your-packages/30708/95) in particular) prompted me to try to track down some packages that led to downgrades in other packages when I run `]up`. Based on [this list](https://gist.github.com/KristofferC/7c8048e2ee9aaa465966caeb98c1446a), it looks like `AWSCore` is restricting `MbedTLS.jl` to a lower version than the latest, so this pr just bumps the allowed range to include [0.7, 0.8). I ran the test-suite locally and everything seemed to work fine, but also understand that there may be a lot more nuances to the upgrade than just the test-suite Co-authored-by: Sebastian Rollen <[email protected]>
Once this is in, we can bump the version in: It should be noted that originally I did not include And issue for this can be found here. |
tryBuild succeeded |
@SebRollen can you also bump the version so we can take and make a release when this is merged in? |
@mattBrzezinski, done. Tried to look for a |
bors r+ |
97: bump mbed_tls version to 0.7 r=mattBrzezinski a=SebRollen Hi, The discussion in a recent discourse thread (and [this post](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/please-be-mindful-of-version-bounds-and-semantic-versioning-when-tagging-your-packages/30708/95) in particular) prompted me to try to track down some packages that led to downgrades in other packages when I run `]up`. Based on [this list](https://gist.github.com/KristofferC/7c8048e2ee9aaa465966caeb98c1446a), it looks like `AWSCore` is restricting `MbedTLS.jl` to a lower version than the latest, so this pr just bumps the allowed range to include [0.7, 0.8). I ran the test-suite locally and everything seemed to work fine, but also understand that there may be a lot more nuances to the upgrade than just the test-suite Co-authored-by: Sebastian Rollen <[email protected]>
Build succeeded |
59: Project.toml include [email protected] r=mattBrzezinski a=mattBrzezinski When `[AWSCore #97](JuliaCloud/AWSCore.jl#97) goes in we can include `[email protected]` in this package. **Note**: Using `[email protected]` will not work w/ Julia `<v1.2` Co-authored-by: Matt Brzezinski <[email protected]>
59: Project.toml include [email protected] r=mattBrzezinski a=mattBrzezinski When `[AWSCore #97](JuliaCloud/AWSCore.jl#97) goes in we can include `[email protected]` in this package. **Note**: Using `[email protected]` will not work w/ Julia `<v1.2` Co-authored-by: Matt Brzezinski <[email protected]>
Hi,
The discussion in a recent discourse thread (and this post in particular) prompted me to try to track down some packages that led to downgrades in other packages when I run
]up
.Based on this list, it looks like
AWSCore
is restrictingMbedTLS.jl
to a lower version than the latest, so this pr just bumps the allowed range to include [0.7, 0.8). I ran the test-suite locally and everything seemed to work fine, but also understand that there may be a lot more nuances to the upgrade than just the test-suite