Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump mbed_tls version to 0.7 #97

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 6, 2019
Merged

bump mbed_tls version to 0.7 #97

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 6, 2019

Conversation

SebRollen
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

The discussion in a recent discourse thread (and this post in particular) prompted me to try to track down some packages that led to downgrades in other packages when I run ]up.

Based on this list, it looks like AWSCore is restricting MbedTLS.jl to a lower version than the latest, so this pr just bumps the allowed range to include [0.7, 0.8). I ran the test-suite locally and everything seemed to work fine, but also understand that there may be a lot more nuances to the upgrade than just the test-suite

@mattBrzezinski
Copy link
Member

bors try

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2019
bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2019
97: bump mbed_tls version to 0.7 r=mattBrzezinski a=SebRollen

Hi,

The discussion in a recent discourse thread (and [this post](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/please-be-mindful-of-version-bounds-and-semantic-versioning-when-tagging-your-packages/30708/95) in particular) prompted me to try to track down some packages that led to downgrades in other packages when I run `]up`.

Based on [this list](https://gist.github.com/KristofferC/7c8048e2ee9aaa465966caeb98c1446a), it looks like `AWSCore` is restricting `MbedTLS.jl` to a lower version than the latest, so this pr just bumps the allowed range to include [0.7, 0.8). I ran the test-suite locally and everything seemed to work fine, but also understand that there may be a lot more nuances to the upgrade than just the test-suite

Co-authored-by: Sebastian Rollen <[email protected]>
@mattBrzezinski
Copy link
Member

Once this is in, we can bump the version in:

https://github.com/JuliaCloud/AWSS3.jl

It should be noted that originally I did not include [email protected], as it is only compatible with Julia1.2.

And issue for this can be found here.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Nov 6, 2019

try

Build succeeded

@mattBrzezinski
Copy link
Member

@SebRollen can you also bump the version so we can take and make a release when this is merged in?

@JuliaCloud JuliaCloud deleted a comment from bors bot Nov 6, 2019
@SebRollen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mattBrzezinski, done. Tried to look for a CHANGELOG.md or similar as well, but didn't find any so I assume it's just the version in project.toml that needed updating?

@mattBrzezinski
Copy link
Member

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2019
97: bump mbed_tls version to 0.7 r=mattBrzezinski a=SebRollen

Hi,

The discussion in a recent discourse thread (and [this post](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/please-be-mindful-of-version-bounds-and-semantic-versioning-when-tagging-your-packages/30708/95) in particular) prompted me to try to track down some packages that led to downgrades in other packages when I run `]up`.

Based on [this list](https://gist.github.com/KristofferC/7c8048e2ee9aaa465966caeb98c1446a), it looks like `AWSCore` is restricting `MbedTLS.jl` to a lower version than the latest, so this pr just bumps the allowed range to include [0.7, 0.8). I ran the test-suite locally and everything seemed to work fine, but also understand that there may be a lot more nuances to the upgrade than just the test-suite

Co-authored-by: Sebastian Rollen <[email protected]>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Nov 6, 2019

Build succeeded

@bors bors bot merged commit 9a667e0 into JuliaCloud:master Nov 6, 2019
bors bot added a commit to JuliaCloud/AWSS3.jl that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2019
59: Project.toml include [email protected] r=mattBrzezinski a=mattBrzezinski

When `[AWSCore #97](JuliaCloud/AWSCore.jl#97) goes in we can include `[email protected]` in this package.

**Note**: Using `[email protected]` will not work w/ Julia `<v1.2`

Co-authored-by: Matt Brzezinski <[email protected]>
bors bot added a commit to JuliaCloud/AWSS3.jl that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2019
59: Project.toml include [email protected] r=mattBrzezinski a=mattBrzezinski

When `[AWSCore #97](JuliaCloud/AWSCore.jl#97) goes in we can include `[email protected]` in this package.

**Note**: Using `[email protected]` will not work w/ Julia `<v1.2`

Co-authored-by: Matt Brzezinski <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants