-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Owner being replaced in github actions #1073
fix: Owner being replaced in github actions #1073
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1073 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 94.18% 94.18%
=======================================
Files 96 96
Lines 5571 5574 +3
Branches 448 448
=======================================
+ Hits 5247 5250 +3
Misses 323 323
Partials 1 1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
c635d4e
to
1a6a0c9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I see how you ended up here but:
- This isn't super scalable: there are likely going to be more and more actions over time.
- There's an action mentioned in the issue and not covered here,
release-it-action
I think the callback method -or something else that doesn't create long regex- would be the way to go.
I agree. I don't like this solution either. I tried coming up with a solution using the callback which should work but I couldn't figure out the correct regex to use. I know my problem was that I change the regex to match This , along with a new
|
Instead of |
Sorry. I get and F on this one. I've tried but got nowhere. I'm adding |
You got it - thanks for trying though! I really appreciate you putting the effort in. ❤️ |
PR Checklist
status: accepting prs
Overview
This PR should fix #1043 Originally I wanted to go with a callback function to exclude certain strings from being replaced but that's above my pay grade.
I don't like the way we are excluding using regex but this should solve the issue in the meantime.
Someday I'll get to that level. 🤓