Form Editor v2.5 #599
Form Editor v2.5 #599
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance various form components in the application, focusing on user interface improvements and accessibility features. Notable updates include dynamic styling for file inputs, adjustments to textarea and text input components by removing the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (25)
client/scss/app.scss (1)
Line range hint
21-23: LGTM! Consider using Tailwind color variables for consistency.The addition of the
--bg-form-colorcustom property is a good practice for centralizing color management. This will enhance maintainability and consistency across the application.For better integration with Tailwind CSS, consider using a Tailwind color variable instead of a hard-coded hex value. For example:
:root { - --bg-form-color: #2563eb; + --bg-form-color: theme('colors.blue.600'); }This ensures that the color stays consistent with your Tailwind theme and makes it easier to manage color schemes.
client/components/forms/components/InputLabel.vue (1)
7-7: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The change from 'text-sm' to 'text-sm/none' for non-uppercase labels is appropriate. It likely improves the layout consistency by removing any default line height.
For improved code clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the reasoning behind the different text styles for uppercase and non-uppercase labels. For example:
:class="[ theme.default.label, // Uppercase labels use smaller text size, while non-uppercase labels have normal size with no line height { 'uppercase text-xs': uppercaseLabels, 'text-sm/none': !uppercaseLabels }, ]"client/components/forms/TextAreaInput.vue (1)
22-22: LGTM! Consider using utility classes consistently.The addition of the 'block' class is appropriate for making the textarea a block-level element. This change improves the layout consistency.
For better maintainability and consistency with the component's styling approach, consider moving the 'resize-y' and 'block' classes into the
theme.default.inputobject in the:classbinding. This would centralize all styling logic::class="[ theme.default.input, theme.default.borderRadius, theme.default.spacing.horizontal, theme.default.spacing.vertical, theme.default.fontSize, { '!ring-red-500 !ring-2 !border-transparent': hasError, '!cursor-not-allowed !bg-gray-200': disabled, 'resize-y block': true, }, ]"client/components/forms/validation/HasError.vue (1)
30-42: LGTM: Improved error handling logicThe changes to the
errorMessagecomputed property enhance the error checking logic and make it more robust. The consistent use ofthis.fieldIdimproves code clarity.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the logic flow, especially for the
baseErrorassignment. This would help future maintainers understand the error handling process more quickly.client/components/global/EditableTag.vue (2)
Line range hint
45-45: LGTM: New prop for dynamic element renderingThe addition of the
elementprop enhances the component's flexibility by allowing dynamic rendering of different HTML elements. This is a good improvement for reusability.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose and usage of this new prop for better documentation.
56-60: LGTM: Improved startEditing function logicThe updates to the
startEditingfunction enhance the control flow by preventing unintended re-entry into edit mode. This is a good improvement for user interaction handling.Consider extracting the condition into a separate, well-named variable for improved readability. For example:
const shouldStartEditing = !editing.value && (event.type !== 'keydown' || event.target === parentRef.value); if (!shouldStartEditing) { return; }This would make the logic more explicit and easier to understand at a glance.
client/components/forms/useFormInput.js (1)
91-97: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments for consistency.The new
onFocusandonBlurfunctions are well-implemented, providing necessary event handling for form inputs. They correctly emit the respective events with the event object.For consistency with other functions in the file, consider adding JSDoc comments:
/** * Handles the focus event of the input. * @param {FocusEvent} event - The focus event object. */ const onFocus = (event) => { context.emit('focus', event) } /** * Handles the blur event of the input. * @param {FocusEvent} event - The blur event object. */ const onBlur = (event) => { context.emit('blur', event) }client/components/open/forms/fields/components/BlockOptions.vue (1)
88-88: LGTM: Consistent layout adjustment for image content blockThe class change from "border-t py-2" to "border-t mt-4" for the image block is consistent with the earlier change for the text block. This maintains a uniform layout approach across different field types.
Consider refactoring to reduce duplication:
<div v-if="['nf-text', 'nf-image'].includes(field.type)" class="border-t mt-4" > <rich-text-area-input v-if="field.type === 'nf-text'" ... /> <image-input v-else ... /> </div>This approach would consolidate the common styling and conditional rendering logic.
client/components/open/forms/fields/components/HiddenRequiredDisabled.vue (1)
Line range hint
1-110: Consider refactoring thetoggleOptionfunction in future iterations.While not directly related to the current changes, the
toggleOptionfunction in the script section handles complex logic for managing the state of multiple interdependent options. To improve maintainability and readability, consider refactoring this function in future iterations. You could potentially break it down into smaller, more focused functions or use a state machine pattern to manage the option states more declaratively.client/components/open/forms/components/FormEditorNavbar.vue (3)
16-23: LGTM! Consider adding aria labels for accessibility.The introduction of the UTabs component improves the organization of the form editor interface. The tabs provide a clear structure for different aspects of form editing.
Consider adding aria labels to improve accessibility:
<UTabs id="form-editor-navbar-tabs" v-model="activeTab" + aria-label="Form Editor Sections" :items="[ - { label: 'Build' }, - { label: 'Design'}, - { label: 'Settings'} + { label: 'Build', ariaLabel: 'Build Form' }, + { label: 'Design', ariaLabel: 'Design Form' }, + { label: 'Settings', ariaLabel: 'Form Settings' } ]" />
33-43: LGTM! Consider using constants for visibility states.The introduction of UBadge components provides clear visual indicators of the form's status. The conditional rendering and color coding enhance user understanding.
For consistency and maintainability, consider using constants for the visibility states:
+const VISIBILITY_STATES = { + DRAFT: 'draft', + CLOSED: 'closed', + PUBLIC: 'public' +} <UBadge - v-if="form.visibility == 'draft'" + v-if="form.visibility === VISIBILITY_STATES.DRAFT" color="yellow" variant="soft" label="Draft" /> <UBadge - v-else-if="form.visibility == 'closed'" + v-else-if="form.visibility === VISIBILITY_STATES.CLOSED" color="gray" variant="soft" label="Closed" />
47-47: LGTM! Consider adding a tooltip for clarity.The addition of the UndoRedo component enhances user experience by providing undo/redo functionality.
Consider adding a tooltip to clarify the component's function:
-<UndoRedo /> +<UTooltip text="Undo/Redo Actions"> + <UndoRedo /> +</UTooltip>client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormEditorPreview.vue (3)
Line range hint
61-86: Great improvements to cover picture and logo handling!The restructuring of the cover picture and logo elements significantly enhances the layout and responsiveness. The use of transitions for showing/hiding these elements adds a nice visual touch. The conditional rendering effectively handles cases where either the cover picture or logo might be missing.
Consider adding alt text for the cover picture img element to improve accessibility:
<img alt="Form Cover Picture" :src="coverPictureSrc(form.cover_picture)" + :alt="form.cover_picture_alt || 'Form cover image'" class="object-cover w-full h-[30vh] object-center" >
Line range hint
134-140: Improved dark mode handling.The addition of the watch effect for
form.value.dark_modeand theonMountedhook ensures that dark mode changes are applied correctly and immediately. ThehandleDarkModeChangefunction encapsulates the dark mode logic, which is a good practice for code organization.Consider debouncing the
handleDarkModeChangefunction in the watch effect to prevent rapid consecutive calls if thedark_modevalue changes frequently:+import { debounce } from 'lodash' +const debouncedHandleDarkModeChange = debounce(handleDarkModeChange, 300) -watch(() => form.value.dark_mode, () => { - handleDarkModeChange() -}) +watch(() => form.value.dark_mode, () => { + debouncedHandleDarkModeChange() +})Also applies to: 147-149
Line range hint
141-146: Good addition of coverPictureSrc function.The
coverPictureSrcfunction effectively handles both remote URLs and local file uploads for cover pictures. This approach is flexible and allows for a unified treatment of different image sources.Consider adding error handling and type checking to make the function more robust:
function coverPictureSrc(val) { + if (!val) return '' try { // Is valid url - new URL(val) + return new URL(val).toString() } catch (_) { // Is file - return URL.createObjectURL(val) + return val instanceof File ? URL.createObjectURL(val) : '' } - return val }client/stores/working_form.js (2)
76-82: Approve the addition ofprefillDefaultmethod with a minor suggestion.The new
prefillDefaultmethod is a good addition that ensures unique field names and sets default content for various block types. This improves the user experience by preventing naming conflicts.However, there's a potential issue with the while loop that might lead to an infinite loop if all possible names are taken.
Consider adding a maximum number of attempts to prevent potential infinite loops:
let baseName = data.name let counter = 1 -while (this.content.properties.some(prop => prop.name === data.name)) { +const MAX_ATTEMPTS = 100 +while (counter < MAX_ATTEMPTS && this.content.properties.some(prop => prop.name === data.name)) { counter++ data.name = `${baseName} ${counter}` } +if (counter === MAX_ATTEMPTS) { + console.warn(`Unable to generate a unique name for ${baseName} after ${MAX_ATTEMPTS} attempts`) +}
Line range hint
136-170: Remove duplicate method definitions.The
removeFieldandinternalRemoveFieldmethods are defined twice with identical implementations. This duplication is unnecessary and could lead to confusion or maintenance issues.Remove the duplicate definitions:
removeField(field) { this.internalRemoveField(field) }, internalRemoveField(field) { const index = this.objectToIndex(field) if (index !== -1) { useAlert().success('Ctrl + Z to undo',10000,{ title: 'Field removed', actions: [{ label: 'Undo', icon:"i-material-symbols-undo", click: () => { this.undo() } }] }) this.content.properties.splice(index, 1) } }, -removeField(field) { - this.internalRemoveField(field) -}, -internalRemoveField(field) { - const index = this.objectToIndex(field) - - if (index !== -1) { - useAlert().success('Ctrl + Z to undo',10000,{ - title: 'Field removed', - actions: [{ - label: 'Undo', - icon:"i-material-symbols-undo", - click: () => { - this.undo() - } - }] - }) - this.content.properties.splice(index, 1) - } -},client/components/open/forms/components/FormFieldsEditor.vue (1)
Line range hint
146-150: Improved field property initializationThe addition of default values for
placeholder,prefill,help, andhelp_positionenhances the robustness of the component by ensuring these properties always exist. This prevents potential errors when accessing these properties elsewhere in the component or its children.For consistency, consider using the same pattern for all properties:
field.placeholder = field.placeholder ?? null; field.prefill = field.prefill ?? null; field.help = field.help ?? null; field.help_position = field.help_position ?? "below_input";This uses the nullish coalescing operator (
??) which is more concise and only assigns the default value if the property isnullorundefined.client/components/forms/FileInput.vue (2)
37-39: Excellent accessibility improvements.The addition of
tabindex="0",role="button", andaria-labelsignificantly enhances the component's accessibility. These changes make the file input more navigable and understandable for users relying on assistive technologies.Consider dynamically setting the
aria-labelbased on themultipleprop::aria-label="multiple ? 'Choose files or drag here' : 'Choose a file or drag here'"This would ensure the aria-label always matches the component's current state.
Line range hint
1-365: Implement file size limit checks.The component mentions a file size limit in the UI (
Size limit: {{ mbLimit }}MB per file), but there's no explicit handling of this limit in the file upload logic. Consider implementing a check in theuploadFileToServermethod to ensure that files exceeding the size limit are not uploaded.Here's a suggested implementation:
uploadFileToServer(file) { if (this.disabled) return // Check file size if (file.size > this.mbLimit * 1024 * 1024) { // Emit an error event or show an error message this.$emit('error', `File size exceeds the ${this.mbLimit}MB limit`) return } this.loading = true // ... rest of the method }This change will improve the user experience by providing immediate feedback on file size restrictions.
client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue (1)
13-25: Improved title rendering logic with editable functionality.The changes enhance the flexibility of title rendering by introducing an editable title in admin preview mode. This improvement aligns well with the component's purpose and provides a better user experience for form editing.
Consider extracting the common class "mb-2" to the parent
<template>element to reduce duplication:-<template v-if="!isHideTitle"> +<template v-if="!isHideTitle" class="mb-2"> <EditableTag v-if="adminPreview" v-model="form.title" element="h1" - class="mb-2" /> <h1 v-else - class="mb-2 px-2" + class="px-2" v-text="form.title" /> </template>client/components/forms/components/VSelect.vue (3)
13-17: Improved visual feedback for focus and error states.The new classes enhance the component's responsiveness to user interactions and error conditions. Good job on applying focus styles only when there's no error.
Consider extracting these complex class bindings into a computed property for better readability and maintainability. For example:
<script> export default { // ... computed: { inputClasses() { return { '!ring-red-500 !ring-2 !border-transparent': this.hasError, '!cursor-not-allowed dark:!bg-gray-600 !bg-gray-200': this.disabled, 'focus-within:ring-2 focus-within:ring-opacity-100 focus-within:border-transparent': !this.hasError } } } // ... } </script>Then in the template:
:class="[theme.SelectInput.input, theme.SelectInput.borderRadius, inputClasses, inputClass]"
251-252: Good additions for value management and focus tracking.The
defaultValueandisFocusedproperties enhance the component's state management capabilities.Consider using a computed property for
defaultValueinstead of storing it in the component's data. This ensures it always reflects the currentmodelValue:computed: { defaultValue() { return this.modelValue ?? null; } }This approach prevents potential synchronization issues between
modelValueanddefaultValue.
321-340: Improved focus management and event handling.The new
onFocusandonBlurmethods, along with their integration intoggleDropdown, enhance the component's focus management capabilities.Consider simplifying the
toggleDropdownmethod by leveraging the existingonFocusandonBlurmethods:toggleDropdown() { if (this.disabled) { this.isOpen = false; this.onBlur(); } else { this.isOpen = !this.isOpen; this.isOpen ? this.onFocus() : this.onBlur(); } if (!this.isOpen) { this.searchTerm = ''; } }This refactoring reduces code duplication and ensures consistent behavior.
client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (1)
94-94: LGTM: Added double-click functionality for image editingThe
@dblclickevent handler improves user experience by allowing quick access to image editing options.Consider adding a tooltip or visual indicator to inform users about this double-click functionality, as it might not be immediately obvious.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (23)
- client/components/forms/FileInput.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/forms/TextAreaInput.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/forms/TextInput.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/forms/components/InputLabel.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/forms/components/InputWrapper.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/forms/components/VSelect.vue (4 hunks)
- client/components/forms/useFormInput.js (2 hunks)
- client/components/forms/validation/HasError.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/global/EditableTag.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenForm.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (4 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/FormEditor.vue (3 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/FormEditorNavbar.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/FormFieldsEditor.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/AddFormBlock.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormEditorPreview.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/templates/QuestionsEditor.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/fields/components/BlockOptions.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/fields/components/HiddenRequiredDisabled.vue (1 hunks)
- client/lib/forms/themes/form-themes.js (3 hunks)
- client/scss/app.scss (1 hunks)
- client/stores/working_form.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (46)
client/scss/app.scss (1)
26-26: LGTM! Verify visual consistency across the application.The update to the
h1styles, reducing the font size slightly and increasing the font weight, aligns with the changes mentioned in other components. This should create a more compact and impactful header style.To ensure visual consistency, please verify the following:
- Check that the new
h1style looks good across different screen sizes.- Confirm that the new style aligns well with other heading levels (
h2,h3, etc.).- Ensure that the increased font weight (
font-extrabold) doesn't cause any readability issues, especially on smaller screens or with longer headings.You may want to review the application in various viewports to confirm the visual appeal and readability of the new
h1style.client/components/forms/TextAreaInput.vue (2)
Line range hint
61-63: Verify character limit display logicThe AI summary mentions the removal of the
showCharLimitprop, but the template still contains logic for displaying the character count. This might lead to inconsistent behavior.Please review and update the following:
- Confirm if the
showCharLimitprop has been removed from the props declaration.- If removed, update the template to remove or modify the character count display logic:
<template v-if="maxCharLimit" #bottom_after_help> <small :class="theme.default.help"> {{ charCount }}/{{ maxCharLimit }} </small> </template>
- If the intention is to always show the character count when
maxCharLimitis set, remove the&& showCharLimitcondition from thev-ifdirective.Would you like assistance in implementing these changes or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
Also applies to: 37-42
Line range hint
1-78: Overall assessment: Minor improvements with potential inconsistencyThe changes to this component are minimal but improve the layout. The addition of the 'block' class to the textarea is beneficial. However, there's a potential inconsistency with the character limit display logic that needs to be addressed.
Key points:
- The textarea styling has been improved.
- The character limit display logic needs to be verified and possibly updated.
Please address the character limit display issue to ensure consistent behavior of the component.
client/components/forms/validation/HasError.vue (4)
5-5: LGTM: Improved error message stylingThe changes to the error message styling (smaller text and adjusted margin) should enhance the overall layout and readability of the form.
50-59: LGTM: Improved error message constructionThe refactored error message construction improves code readability and maintainability. The use of template literals and array methods makes the code more concise and easier to understand.
64-64: LGTM: Improved string manipulationThe use of template literals in the
getSubErrormethod improves code readability without changing functionality. This is a good modernization of the code.
19-26: LGTM: Improved prop naming and added flexibilityThe renaming of
fieldtofieldIdand the addition of the optionalfieldNameprop enhance the component's clarity and flexibility. These changes align well with the modifications in theerrorMessagecomputed property.To ensure that these prop changes are reflected in all parent components, run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Check for usage of the old 'field' prop and the new 'fieldId' and 'fieldName' props rg -t vue "HasError.*field[^I]" --stats rg -t vue "HasError.*fieldId" --stats rg -t vue "HasError.*fieldName" --statsThis will help identify any components that need to be updated to use the new prop names.
client/components/forms/components/InputWrapper.vue (1)
48-49: LGTM! Improved error handling props.The changes to the
has-errorcomponent props enhance error handling precision and accessibility. Usingfield-idandfield-nameseparately allows for more accurate field identification and user-friendly error messages.To ensure consistency, let's verify the
has-errorcomponent implementation:✅ Verification successful
Verified! The
has-errorcomponent props are correctly updated.The
HasError.vuecomponent now usesfield-idandfield-nameprops as intended, and no instances of the oldfieldprop remain in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify HasError component prop usage # Test: Check HasError component implementation ast-grep --pattern $'<script setup> $$$ defineProps({ $$$ fieldId: $$$, fieldName: $$$, $$$ }) $$$ </script>' client/components/forms/components/HasError.vue # Test: Check for any remaining usage of the old 'field' prop rg -i 'field(?!-|\w).*prop' client/components/formsLength of output: 559
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate HasError.vue and check for old 'field' prop usage # Find the path to HasError.vue fd --type f --name 'HasError.vue' # If the file is found, verify its props without using look-around ast-grep --pattern '<script setup> $$$ defineProps({ $$$ fieldId: $$$, fieldName: $$$, $$$ }) $$$ </script>' $(fd --type f --name 'HasError.vue') # Search for any remaining usage of the old 'field' prop without look-around rg -i 'field\s*prop' client/components/formsLength of output: 752
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate HasError.vue and check for old 'field' prop usage # Find the path to HasError.vue HAS_ERROR_PATH=$(fd 'HasError.vue' client/components/forms/components) # If the file is found, verify its props if [ -f "$HAS_ERROR_PATH" ]; then ast-grep --pattern '<script setup> $$$ defineProps({ $$$ fieldId: $$$, fieldName: $$$, $$$ }) $$$ </script>' "$HAS_ERROR_PATH" else echo "HasError.vue not found." fi # Search for any remaining usage of the old 'field' prop without look-around rg -i 'field\s*prop' client/components/formsLength of output: 191
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate HasError.vue anywhere within client/components/forms and check for old 'field' prop usage # Find the path to HasError.vue within client/components/forms HAS_ERROR_PATH=$(fd 'HasError\.vue' client/components/forms) # If the file is found, verify its props if [ -n "$HAS_ERROR_PATH" ]; then ast-grep --pattern '<script setup> $$$ defineProps({ $$$ fieldId: $$$, fieldName: $$$, $$$ }) $$$ </script>' "$HAS_ERROR_PATH" else echo "HasError.vue not found within client/components/forms." fi # Search for any remaining usage of the old 'field' prop without look-around rg -i 'field\s*=' client/components/formsLength of output: 416
client/components/global/EditableTag.vue (2)
18-18: LGTM: Simplified slot content renderingThe removal of the
<label>element simplifies the markup without affecting functionality. This change improves code readability and aligns well with the component's purpose.
Line range hint
1-93: Overall assessment: Positive improvements to EditableTag componentThe changes to the EditableTag component enhance its flexibility and improve user interaction handling. The introduction of the
elementprop for dynamic rendering, simplification of slot content, and refinement of thestartEditingfunction logic are all positive improvements. These modifications make the component more versatile and robust without introducing any significant issues.client/components/forms/TextInput.vue (1)
34-35: LGTM: Addition of focus and blur event handlers.The addition of
@focusand@blurevent listeners enhances the component's interactivity, allowing it to respond to focus state changes. This is consistent with similar updates in other components mentioned in the summary.To ensure proper implementation, please verify the existence and correct implementation of
onFocusandonBlurmethods:Additionally, the AI summary mentions the removal of the
showCharLimitprop, but this change is not visible in the provided code. Could you please clarify if this prop has been removed, and if so, provide the relevant code changes?client/components/forms/useFormInput.js (2)
115-116: LGTM! Proper exposure of new functions.The addition of
onFocusandonBlurto the return object is correct and consistent with the implementation. This change ensures that components using this composable can access these new event handlers.
Line range hint
91-116: Great addition of focus and blur event handling!The changes to
useFormInputenhance the composable's functionality by adding focus and blur event handling. This improvement allows for better control and responsiveness in form inputs across the application. The implementation is clean, consistent with the existing code structure, and properly exposes the new functionality to components using this composable.client/components/open/forms/fields/components/BlockOptions.vue (2)
56-56: LGTM: Layout adjustment for text content blockThe class change from "border-t py-2" to "border-t mt-4" removes vertical padding and adds a top margin. This adjustment affects the spacing of the text content block, potentially improving its visual separation from other elements.
Line range hint
1-143: Summary: Minor layout adjustments improve visual consistencyThe changes in this file focus on layout adjustments for text and image content blocks. These modifications enhance visual consistency and potentially improve the overall user interface. The script section remains unchanged, maintaining the existing logic for handling field properties.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/AddFormBlock.vue (3)
21-23: LGTM: Improved visual hierarchy for "Input Blocks" label.The styling changes to the "Input Blocks" label enhance the visual hierarchy by making it less prominent. This helps to focus user attention on the actual input blocks below.
Line range hint
1-114: Summary of changes in AddFormBlock.vueThe changes in this file are minor and focused on improving the visual design:
- The "Input Blocks" label has been styled to be less prominent.
- A 'group' class has been added to the draggable item container, potentially for enhanced interaction styling.
These changes should improve the user interface without affecting the component's functionality. However, it would be beneficial to understand the full context of these changes, especially regarding the 'group' class addition.
37-37: Clarify the purpose of the new 'group' class.The addition of the 'group' class to the draggable item container is approved. This class is often used in Tailwind CSS for applying styles to child elements based on the parent's state. However, the exact purpose and impact of this change are not immediately clear from the provided code.
Could you please clarify the intended styling behavior associated with this new 'group' class? Are there corresponding CSS changes in other files that utilize this class?
To verify the usage of the 'group' class, you can run the following script:
client/components/open/forms/fields/components/HiddenRequiredDisabled.vue (1)
10-12: Improved visual feedback for selected options.The addition of the
bg-blue-50class for selected options enhances the user interface by providing clearer visual distinction. This change improves the overall user experience by making it easier for users to identify which options are currently selected.client/components/open/forms/components/templates/QuestionsEditor.vue (1)
102-102: LGTM: Consistent update to error handling propThe change from
:fieldto:field-idin thehas-errorcomponent is consistent with similar updates in other components mentioned in the PR summary. This update likely improves error handling by using a more specific identifier.client/components/open/forms/components/FormEditorNavbar.vue (2)
27-32: LGTM! Improved flexibility with the 'element' prop.The repositioning of the EditableTag component and the addition of the 'element' prop improve both the layout structure and component flexibility. The class and id attributes ensure proper styling and identification.
Line range hint
138-138: LGTM! Proper state management for the new tabs.The addition of the activeTab state from the workingFormStore aligns well with the new UTabs component. The use of storeToRefs ensures proper reactivity.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormEditorPreview.vue (2)
25-27: LGTM: Improved UI by preventing text selection.Adding the
select-noneclass to the "Form Preview" text is a good UI practice. It prevents accidental text selection, enhancing the user experience.
Line range hint
156-158: LGTM: Simple and effective toggleExpand function.The
toggleExpandfunction provides a clean way to toggle the expanded/collapsed state of the form preview. Its simplicity makes it easy to understand and maintain.client/stores/working_form.js (1)
Line range hint
84-135: Approve the updates to theaddBlockmethod.The changes to the
addBlockmethod are well-implemented. The use of the newprefillDefaultmethod ensures consistent handling of new blocks. The method correctly sets default values for various block types and handles the insertion of new blocks at the appropriate index.client/components/open/forms/components/FormFieldsEditor.vue (1)
55-55: Improved cursor style consistencyThe addition of the
!modifier tocursor-pointerensures that the pointer cursor style is consistently applied to this button, overriding any potential conflicting styles. This change enhances the user experience by providing clear visual feedback for interactive elements.client/components/open/forms/components/FormEditor.vue (5)
7-13: LGTM: Loading overlay addition enhances user feedback.The addition of a loading overlay is a good improvement to the user experience. It provides clear visual feedback during form updates, which is especially important for longer operations.
185-185: LGTM: Default tab selection on mount.Setting the
activeTabto 0 on component mount ensures consistent initial state across the application. This change aligns well with the overall improvements in tab management mentioned in the PR summary.
303-304: LGTM: Improved loading state management in saveFormCreate.The addition of a promise resolution after the router push operation ensures that the
updateFormLoadingstate is correctly reset, even if there's a delay in navigation. This change improves the reliability of the loading indicator.
Line range hint
305-320: LGTM: Improved error handling in saveFormCreate.The changes to error handling in the
saveFormCreatemethod are well-implemented:
- Setting
updateFormLoadingto false in the catch block ensures the loading state is reset even when an error occurs.- Removing the
finallyblock is appropriate as the loading state is now handled in both success and error cases.These changes contribute to more robust error handling and state management.
Line range hint
1-370: Overall assessment: Solid improvements to FormEditor component.The changes made to the FormEditor component consistently enhance user experience and error handling:
- Addition of a loading overlay provides clear visual feedback during form operations.
- Improved tab management ensures consistent initial state.
- Enhanced loading state management in the
saveFormCreatemethod increases reliability.- Refined error handling ensures proper state reset in all scenarios.
These improvements align well with the PR objectives and contribute to a more robust and user-friendly form editing experience.
client/components/forms/FileInput.vue (3)
22-22: Verify theinputStyleprop.The
:stylebinding forinputStylehas been added, which allows for dynamic styling of the input container. However, theinputStyleprop is not defined in the component's props.Please ensure that the
inputStyleprop is properly defined in the component's props. If it's missing, add it like this:props: { // ... other props inputStyle: { type: Object, default: () => ({}) }, }
33-35: Improved visual feedback for error and focus states.The added classes enhance the UI by providing clear visual cues for error states and focus. This improvement aligns with best practices for form accessibility and user experience.
44-44: Enhanced keyboard accessibility.The addition of
@keydown.enter.prevent="openFileUpload"improves keyboard accessibility by allowing users to activate the file upload using the Enter key. This is a valuable enhancement for users who navigate primarily using a keyboard.client/components/forms/components/VSelect.vue (2)
246-246: LGTM: Enhanced event emission for focus management.The addition of 'focus' and 'blur' to the emits array is a good practice. It clearly communicates the component's contract and allows parent components to respond to focus changes.
Line range hint
1-400: Overall assessment: Improved focus management and user interaction.The changes in this file significantly enhance the
VSelectcomponent's focus handling and user interaction capabilities. The addition of focus and blur event management, along with improved visual feedback for different states, contributes to a more robust and user-friendly component.Key improvements:
- Enhanced visual feedback for focus and error states
- Better focus state tracking and event emission
- Improved dropdown toggle behavior
While the changes are generally positive, consider addressing the accessibility concern with the focus outline removal and implementing the suggested minor improvements for code clarity and maintainability.
These enhancements align well with the PR objectives of improving user interface and accessibility features across form components.
client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (5)
119-119: LGTM: Improved drag handle visibilityAdding
min-h-[40px]to the drag handle ensures a consistent minimum height, enhancing usability across different screen sizes and content layouts.
71-71: LGTM: Adjusted vertical margin for text elementsChanging from
mb-3tomy-1.5creates a more symmetric vertical margin. This could lead to a more compact layout.Please verify that this change doesn't negatively impact the visual spacing between text elements across different form configurations.
79-79: LGTM: Consistent margin adjustment for code elementsThe change from
mb-3tomy-1.5aligns with the modification made to text elements, ensuring consistency across different content types.
22-22: LGTM: Minor adjustment to element positioningChanging from
-bottom-1.5to-bottom-1slightly adjusts the vertical position of an element.Please verify that this minor change doesn't cause any unintended misalignment with surrounding elements in various form configurations.
Line range hint
1-458: Overall assessment: Improved layout consistency and user interactionThe changes in this file primarily focus on refining the layout and enhancing user interaction. Key modifications include:
- Standardized vertical margins for text and code elements.
- Improved drag handle visibility.
- Added double-click functionality for image editing.
- Minor adjustments to element positioning.
These changes contribute to a more consistent and user-friendly interface. However, it's important to verify that these adjustments don't negatively impact the visual layout across different form configurations.
client/lib/forms/themes/form-themes.js (4)
8-10: Improved vertical spacing consistencyThe change from
mb-(margin-bottom) tomy-(margin-top and margin-bottom) in the wrapper classes provides more consistent vertical spacing for form elements. This update might affect the layout, but it should improve overall visual consistency.
159-161: Consistent theme updatesThe changes in the
simpletheme mirror those in thedefaulttheme, maintaining consistency across themes. This update ensures that the improved vertical spacing is applied uniformly, enhancing the overall coherence of the form styling.
304-306: Consistent theme updates across all themesThe changes to the
wrapperclasses in thenotiontheme are consistent with the updates in thedefaultandsimplethemes. This ensures a uniform approach to vertical spacing across all theme variations.
Line range hint
391-391: Clarification needed on DateInput paddingA small padding (
p-[1px]) has been added to theDateInputcomponent in thenotiontheme. While this might be intended to fine-tune its appearance, it would be helpful to understand the specific reason for this change.Could you please explain the rationale behind adding this 1px padding to the
DateInputcomponent in thenotiontheme? Is this addressing a specific visual issue or alignment concern?client/components/open/forms/OpenForm.vue (1)
91-91: Confirm 'field-id' prop usage in 'HasError' componentThe change from
fieldtofield-idin theHasErrorcomponent reflects an update in the prop naming convention. Ensure that theHasErrorcomponent is updated to accept thefield-idprop and that all instances ofHasErroracross the codebase have been updated accordingly to prevent any runtime errors.Run the following script to check for any remaining usages of the
fieldprop inHasErrorcomponents:
| // Check if baseError starts with "The {field.name} field" and replace if necessary | ||
| console.log(this.fieldName, baseError,baseError.startsWith(`The ${this.fieldName} field`)) | ||
| if (baseError.startsWith(`The ${this.fieldName} field`)) { | ||
| baseError = baseError.replace(`The ${this.fieldName} field`, 'This field') | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error message and remove debug statement
The new conditional check to replace "The {field.name} field" with "This field" enhances the readability of error messages. This is a good improvement.
However, there's a console.log statement on line 45 that should be removed before merging to production:
-console.log(this.fieldName, baseError,baseError.startsWith(`The ${this.fieldName} field`))📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Check if baseError starts with "The {field.name} field" and replace if necessary | |
| console.log(this.fieldName, baseError,baseError.startsWith(`The ${this.fieldName} field`)) | |
| if (baseError.startsWith(`The ${this.fieldName} field`)) { | |
| baseError = baseError.replace(`The ${this.fieldName} field`, 'This field') | |
| } | |
| // Check if baseError starts with "The {field.name} field" and replace if necessary | |
| if (baseError.startsWith(`The ${this.fieldName} field`)) { | |
| baseError = baseError.replace(`The ${this.fieldName} field`, 'This field') | |
| } |
| v-html="errorMessage" | ||
| /> | ||
| </transition> | ||
| </template> | ||
|
|
||
| <script> | ||
| export default { | ||
| name: "HasError", | ||
| name: 'HasError', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent Quote Usage Detected for Component Names
Multiple Vue component names use both single and double quotes. Please standardize quote usage across all component names to maintain consistency.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Consistent quote usage
The change from double quotes to single quotes for the component name is a good stylistic choice.
To ensure consistency across the project, you may want to run the following command:
This will help identify any inconsistencies in quote usage for component names across your Vue files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for inconsistent quote usage in Vue component names
rg -t vue "name: [\"'].*[\"']" --stats
Length of output: 207
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for inconsistent quote usage in Vue component names by targeting .vue files
rg -g '*.vue' 'name: [\"'].*[\"']' --stats
Length of output: 130
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for inconsistent quote usage in Vue component names by targeting .vue files
rg -g '*.vue' 'name: ["\'].*["\']' --stats
Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for inconsistent quote usage in Vue component names by targeting .vue files
rg -g '*.vue' "name: [\"'].*[\"']" --stats
Length of output: 24795
| @@ -19,12 +23,14 @@ | |||
| aria-haspopup="listbox" | |||
| aria-expanded="true" | |||
| aria-labelledby="listbox-label" | |||
| class="cursor-pointer w-full flex-grow relative" | |||
| class="cursor-pointer w-full flex-grow relative focus:outline-none" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Accessibility concern with focus outline removal.
While the new focus and blur event listeners improve focus state tracking, removing the default focus outline (focus:outline-none) can negatively impact accessibility for keyboard users.
Consider keeping the focus outline or replacing it with a custom focus indicator that meets accessibility standards. For example:
class="cursor-pointer w-full flex-grow relative focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-blue-500"The addition of @focus and @blur event listeners is a good improvement for managing focus state.
Also applies to: 32-33
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- client/components/forms/validation/HasError.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
client/components/forms/validation/HasError.vue (3)
13-26: LGTM! Props are well-defined and semanticThe prop changes improve clarity:
- Renaming
fieldtofieldIdbetter represents its purpose- Adding
fieldNamesupports customized error messages
44-58: Consider XSS protection and error message robustnessTwo potential security and reliability concerns:
- Direct HTML injection via v-html could be vulnerable to XSS if error messages contain malicious content
- The field name replacement logic assumes exact string matching
Consider:
- Sanitizing HTML content before rendering
- Using a more robust string replacement approach
5-5: Verify styling changes align with design systemThe change from
text-smtotext-xsmakes error messages smaller, and the spacing change from-bottom-3tomt-1affects the layout flow. Please ensure these changes align with the design system and maintain adequate readability.
| }, | ||
| computed: { | ||
| errorMessage() { | ||
| if (!this.form || !this.form.errors || !this.form.errors.any()) | ||
| if (!this.form.errors || !this.form.errors.any()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add null check for form.errors
The current check could throw an error if form.errors is undefined. Consider adding a null check.
-if (!this.form.errors || !this.form.errors.any())
+if (!this.form?.errors?.any())📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (!this.form.errors || !this.form.errors.any()) | |
| if (!this.form?.errors?.any()) |
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| methods: { | ||
| getSubError(subErrorKey) { | ||
| return this.form.errors.get(subErrorKey).replace(subErrorKey, "item") | ||
| return this.form.errors.get(subErrorKey).replace(subErrorKey, 'item') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making error key replacement configurable
The hardcoded replacement of the key with 'item' might not be suitable for all contexts. Consider making this configurable through props.
+props: {
+ subErrorReplacement: {
+ type: String,
+ default: 'item'
+ }
+},
methods: {
getSubError(subErrorKey) {
- return this.form.errors.get(subErrorKey).replace(subErrorKey, 'item')
+ return this.form.errors.get(subErrorKey).replace(subErrorKey, this.subErrorReplacement)
}
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style
Chores
These updates aim to improve user experience through better accessibility, visual feedback, and streamlined form interactions.