-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is this still an attempt? #84
Comments
We made the self-check a two step process to be able to debug a mismatch between opw parameters and URDF more easily. First all 0 is checked and it fails here. Sign corrections do not have any influence for the all-0 position. You don't have an error about a pose position so your distances and most of the offsets appear to be correct. Maybe your last frame is oriented differently? Or has some joint offset? Do you have a link to the robot and it's URDF? |
Thanks for your kindly reply.Here is my respiratory;https://github.com/AltinayGrass/sr80_moveit_config/tree/noeticOn Nov 5, 2022 23:49, Simon Schmeisser ***@***.***> wrote:
We made the self-check a two step process to be able to debug a mismatch between opw parameters and URDF more easily.
First all 0 is checked and it fails here. Sign corrections do not have any influence for the all-0 position. You don't have an error about a pose position so your distances and most of the offsets appear to be correct. Maybe your last frame is oriented differently? Or has some joint offset?
Do you have a link to the robot and it's URDF?
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Hello Simon,
I checked my 3D data and URDF file. Robot has more than one rotation axis on its links. Could this the cause of the error?
Thanks in advance
From: Simon Schmeisser ***@***.***>
Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2022 23:50
To: JeroenDM/moveit_opw_kinematics_plugin ***@***.***>
Cc: Ağan Şimşek ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [JeroenDM/moveit_opw_kinematics_plugin] Is this still an attempt? (Issue #84)
We made the self-check a two step process to be able to debug a mismatch between opw parameters and URDF more easily.
First all 0 is checked and it fails here. Sign corrections do not have any influence for the all-0 position. You don't have an error about a pose position so your distances and most of the offsets appear to be correct. Maybe your last frame is oriented differently? Or has some joint offset?
Do you have a link to the robot and it's URDF?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#84 (comment)> , or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXISIJKFFLGF66R734VDXCDWG3B6PANCNFSM6AAAAAARYCNRV4> .
You are receiving this because you authored the thread. <https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AXISIJJUDO5MIG6SEANZD5LWG3B6PA5CNFSM6AAAAAARYCNRV6WGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTSNYM3KC.gif> Message ID: ***@***.*** ***@***.***> >
|
If not. I have a issue.
[ INFO] [1667678533.447750440]: Loading robot model 'SR80'...
[ INFO] [1667678533.483845187]: MoveItOPWKinematicsPlugin initializing
[ INFO] [1667678533.484084543]: Dimension planning group 'manipulator': 6. Active Joints Models: 6. Mimic Joint Models: 0
[ INFO] [1667678533.484296375]: Getting kinematic parameters from parameter server.
[ INFO] [1667678533.487320942]: Loaded parameters for ik solver:
Distances: [0.175 -0.206 0 0.63 0.905 1.02 0.25]
Offsets = [0 0 -1.5708 0 0 0 ]
Sign_corrections = [1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 ]
[ERROR] [1667678533.489210980]: Pose orientation error on element (1, 1).
[ERROR] [1667678533.489230847]: opw: 1.000000, moveit: -1.000000.
[ERROR] [1667678533.489239844]: Pose orientation error on element (2, 0).
[ERROR] [1667678533.489247963]: opw: -1.000000, moveit: 1.000000.
[ERROR] [1667678533.489259009]: The OPW parameters loaded from the parameter server appear to be incorrect (self-test failed for '0 0 0 0 0 0').
I tried all combination around sign corrections but I will not solve the orientation error.
Should I change URDF definition ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: