-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error: You have exceeded a secondary rate limit. Please wait a few minutes before you try again. #142
Comments
If you run a simple workflow that has an existing issue already created a few times this issue can be easily replicated. |
Thanks for reporting @SteveBox0. Can you be more specific? If you can give clear steps to reproduce it, that'd help a lot in my understanding, as I haven't seen it myself before. |
@JasonEtco Apologies for the delay but needed to do some more testing to be 100% sure. From the looks the issue occurs a lot more on self hosted github runners as you can have multiple runners requesting github API from the same IP. While github hosted runners each have a unique IP thus much lower chance of hitting the rate limit. For your own testing i would suggest running up a couple of github runners in docker containers (https://github.com/myoung34/docker-github-actions-runner). Then any simple github workflow with checking if an existing issue already exists should be enough. Run a couple of them around the same time, can be across different repos but with the same runner pool. |
we have the same issue in a scheduled workflow every time. it's using a ubuntu-latest runner. So it doesn't matter if selfhosted or not. |
Happens to me as well, on GitHub-hosted runners. |
hey everyone, is there any workaround for this? having the same issue on a github-hosted runner |
@jgabuya usually just waiting for a while and re-running the job or triggering a new one works for me. |
A possible way to address this is to use a token from a github app. The rate limits for normal tokens are fairly low. I am unclear whether an app token gets higher secondary limits - the primary limits are a lot higher |
Also getting this about 1/5 of the time when using this action. The action runs once every 12 hours so there should not be any ratelimits hit https://github.com/Botspot/pi-apps/actions/runs/8466989961/job/23197549473 |
* Avoid rate limit error on scheduled daily test There appears to be an issue when scanning issues for a matching issue title which triggers a secondary rate limit error. As this is not the primary feature we are using and an optimization, removing this for now See: https://github.com/mlcommons/newhelm/actions/runs/8604877224/job/23579923706 See: JasonEtco/create-an-issue#142
* Avoid rate limit error on scheduled daily test There appears to be an issue when scanning issues for a matching issue title which triggers a secondary rate limit error. As this is not the primary feature we are using and an optimization, removing this for now See: https://github.com/mlcommons/newhelm/actions/runs/8604877224/job/23579923706 See: JasonEtco/create-an-issue#142
* Avoid rate limit error on scheduled daily test There appears to be an issue when scanning issues for a matching issue title which triggers a secondary rate limit error. As this is not the primary feature we are using and an optimization, removing this for now See: https://github.com/mlcommons/newhelm/actions/runs/8604877224/job/23579923706 See: JasonEtco/create-an-issue#142
Same error here. It seems to be triggered easily when using the "update_existing: true" parameter, so the search/issues endpoint is the one affected by the secondary rate limit. Any updates on this issue? |
The job sometimes fails because we're hitting a rate limit. Removing `update_existing: true` seems to the main culprit for hitting the rate limit. See JasonEtco/create-an-issue#142 (comment) works on #359
The job sometimes fails because we're hitting a rate limit. Removing `update_existing: true` seems to the main culprit for hitting the rate limit. See JasonEtco/create-an-issue#142 (comment) works on #359
As per Github docs it should retry after a period of time based off the HTTP response header "Retry-After: ".
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/guides/best-practices-for-integrators?apiVersion=2022-11-28#dealing-with-secondary-rate-limits
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: