Close the tab that the cursor is on when right-clicking and selecting close

[HoussemNasri]

Fixes #8180

The fix works for both Right-Click > Close and Right-Click > Close others
This fixes the whole context menu but now the PR title is misleading, I couldn't come up with a good one, if you have a better one, please edit it

• Change in CHANGELOG.md described in a way that is understandable for the average user (if applicable)
• Tests created for changes (if applicable)
• Manually tested changed features in running JabRef (always required)
• Screenshots added in PR description (for UI changes)
• Checked documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I created an issue at https://github.com/JabRef/user-documentation/issues or, even better, I submitted a pull request to the documentation repository.

[HoussemNasri]

This unit test CompositeIdFetcherTest added recently in #8129 is failing

[Siedlerchr]

@HoussemNasri Oh thanks, probably forgotten to add it with the @FetcherTest annotation. Then it will be only run in the fetcher test workflow. Can you add it?

[HoussemNasri]

My fork doesn't contain those changes, should I update it?

[Siedlerchr]

You can directly fix that in this pr

[HoussemNasri]

Can you elaborate more

[Siedlerchr]

Add:
@FetcherTest
above

jabref/src/test/java/org/jabref/logic/importer/fetcher/CompositeIdFetcherTest.java

Lines 28 to 29 in 2153a05

	*/
	class CompositeIdFetcherTest {

See also the other fetch test classes. The annotation is used to categorize and excklude the fetcher tests from the normal Test workflow as they will often fail due to rate limits when they are run everytime.

[HoussemNasri]

Sorry for the misconception, I understand what the change should look like but my problem is mainly with Git/Github, my fork is outdated and I can't find CompositeIdFetcherTest , I don't know if updating my fork would create problems with the fix-8180 branch and this PR

[Siedlerchr]

Ah okay, no, you should be able to do a git merge upstream/master into your branch. That should not create any conflicts (except for Changelog maybe)

[Siedlerchr]

From my perspective the fixes look good, and I guess @koppor will be happy :)

[calixtus]

LGTM! Thanks!