Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Export as OpenOffice/LibreOffice CSV not escaping commas within the abstract field (i.e. Custom1) #9087

Closed
2 tasks done
adrianocorrea opened this issue Aug 23, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #9570
Closed
2 tasks done
Assignees
Labels
export / save good first issue An issue intended for project-newcomers. Varies in difficulty.

Comments

@adrianocorrea
Copy link

JabRef version

5.7 (latest release)

Operating system

Windows

Details on version and operating system

Windows 11 21H2

Checked with the latest development build

  • I made a backup of my libraries before testing the latest development version.
  • I have tested the latest development version and the problem persists

Steps to reproduce the behaviour

  1. Create a library with the following entries:
@Article{Belkhouja2021,
  author   = {Belkhouja, Mustapha and Fattoum, Senda and Yoon, Hyungseok (David)},
  title    = {Does greater diversification increase individual productivity? {The} moderating effect of attention allocation.},
  issn     = {00487333},
  number   = {6},
  volume   = {50},
  abstract = {∙ This study investigates how scholars' diversification of their portfolio of research disciplines and coauthors affects their research productivity. ∙ A moderate level of knowledge diversification is optimal for research productivity when the level of cognitive attention is low. ∙ A high level of knowledge diversification is beneficial for research productivity when the level of cognitive attention is high. ∙ A moderate level of collaborator diversification coupled with a high level of collaborative attention is optimal for research productivity. Despite the consensus on the "double-edged sword" effect of diversification (of knowledge and collaborators) on individual performance, little is known about the contingencies that affect the relationship between diversification and individual productivity. Drawing on the attention-based view, we theorize the moderating role of attention allocation to advance our understanding of the curvilinear relationship between diversification (of knowledge and collaborators) and individual productivity. Relevant hypotheses are tested using a longitudinal sample of more than 25,000 individual scholars. Our analysis reveals that although a moderate level of knowledge diversification is optimal for research productivity when the level of cognitive attention is low, a high level of knowledge diversification is more beneficial for research productivity when the level of cognitive attention is high. Furthermore, we show that a moderate level of collaborator diversification, coupled with a high level of collaborative attention, is optimal for research productivity. Our study provides important implications for highly skilled and creative individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]},
  journal  = {Research Policy},
  keywords = {Attention, Cognition, Collaboration, Diversification, Portfolio diversification, Research productivity},
  month    = jul,
  year     = {2021},
}
@Article{Dai2019,
  author   = {Dai, Weiqi and Liao, Mingqing},
  title    = {Entrepreneurial attention to deregulations and reinvestments by private firms: {Evidence} from {China}.},
  doi      = {10.1007/s10490-018-9574-z},
  issn     = {02174561},
  note     = {Publisher: Springer Nature},
  number   = {4},
  pages    = {1221--1250},
  volume   = {36},
  abstract = {To increase the understanding of entrepreneurship in China and contribute to the view that deregulation facilitates the rapid development of the private sector in transitional economies, we examine the positive relationship between entrepreneurial attention to deregulation (formal institution at the country level) and reinvestment by Chinese private firms. We supplement this main aim by identifying two moderating factors: the entrepreneurs' political connections (informal institution) and the regional institution development (formal institution at the regional level). We also explore how the interaction of political connections and regional institution development moderate the "entrepreneurial attention to deregulation-reinvestment" link. We find support for our hypotheses from survey data on 3,284 private firms in China. This paper contributes to the research on the relationship between institution and entrepreneurship in general and the association of deregulation and reinvestment in particular by considering two categories of institutional arrangements (formal and informal institutions; national and regional institutions) simultaneously and by exploring the antecedent of reinvestment from a fresh perspective—the attention-based view, highlighting the importance of "noticed" or "perceived" deregulation that influences entrepreneurial decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]},
  journal  = {Asia Pacific Journal of Management},
  keywords = {Attention-based view, China, Deregulation, Institutional theory, Political connections, Private sector, Regional institutions, Reinvestment, Rural development, Transition economies},
  month    = dec,
  year     = {2019},
}
  1. Go to File>Export>Export all entries and select OpenOffice/LibreOffice CSV (*.csv). Save the file.
  2. Open the saved file with OpenOffice or Excel.
  3. Go to column "AA", labelled "Custom1". You will notice that the abstract field spills over to columns "Custom2", "Custom3", etc. However, the expected behaviour would be for the abstract to be solely in column "Custom1" (see OpenOffice Export Layout).

Appendix

No response

roryoday pushed a commit to roryoday/jabref that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2022
@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr added the good first issue An issue intended for project-newcomers. Varies in difficulty. label Nov 1, 2022
@roryoday
Copy link
Contributor

roryoday commented Nov 2, 2022

Could I be assigned this issue?

@ThiloteE ThiloteE moved this to Free to take in Good First Issues Nov 3, 2022
@ThiloteE ThiloteE moved this from Free to take to Reserved in Good First Issues Nov 3, 2022
@ThiloteE ThiloteE added the FirstTimeCodeContribution Triggers GitHub Greeter Workflow label Nov 3, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2022

As a general advice for newcomers: check out Contributing for a start. Also, guidelines for setting up a local workspace is worth having a look at.

Feel free to ask here at GitHub, if you have any issue related questions. If you have questions about how to setup your workspace use JabRef's Gitter chat. Try to open a (draft) pull-request early on, so that people can see you are working on the issue and so that they can see the direction the pull request is heading towards. This way, you will likely receive valuable feedback.

@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr moved this from Reserved to Free to take in Good First Issues Dec 20, 2022
@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr removed the FirstTimeCodeContribution Triggers GitHub Greeter Workflow label Dec 20, 2022
@Ravitwr
Copy link
Contributor

Ravitwr commented Jan 18, 2023

Could I be assigned this issue?

@ThiloteE ThiloteE moved this from Free to take to Reserved in Good First Issues Jan 18, 2023
@ThiloteE ThiloteE moved this from Reserved to In Progress in Good First Issues Jan 20, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in Good First Issues Jan 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
export / save good first issue An issue intended for project-newcomers. Varies in difficulty.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants