-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Search for field not containing multiple possible strings #6271
Comments
I found one way, but it is quite verbose:
Is there anything more concise? |
This issue has been inactive for half a year. Since JabRef is constantly evolving this issue may not be relevant any longer and it will be closed in two weeks if no further activity occurs. As part of an effort to ensure that the JabRef team is focusing on important and valid issues, we would like to ask if you could update the issue if it still persists. This could be in the following form:
Thank you for your contribution! |
4eee79a Fix director not showing in MHRAs (#6271) 20c4b5e Update the-journal-of-pain.csl (#6202) 6ba269f Added missing book volume in short-title-note (#6262) 1a11c0f Update harvard-stellenbosch-university.csl (#6256) 6b598e7 Update karstenia.csl (#6242) 38bc5fe APA: Swap priority for periodical page and number (#6255) git-subtree-dir: buildres/csl/csl-styles git-subtree-split: 4eee79a
In the absence of group subtraction possibilities, I must resort to search queries like this:
groups contains "ContainsFunction" and not (groups contains "Earthquake")
Is it possible to have additional strings in the
not
clause? I tried the following without success:groups contains "ContainsFunction" and not (groups contains "Earthquake", "Flood")
groups contains "ContainsFunction" and not (groups contains "Earthquake") and not (groups contains "Floods")
How can I get the intended result? Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: