Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 5, 2024. It is now read-only.

[BUG] The time circle has a non-centralized position #3599

Closed
1 task done
adanyl0v opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3605
Closed
1 task done

[BUG] The time circle has a non-centralized position #3599

adanyl0v opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3605
Labels
approved Approved by the Ivy Wallet team. Ready for dev bug Something isn't working

Comments

@adanyl0v
Copy link

Please confirm the following

Describe the bug

When you add a new entry, when you specify a timestamp, the time circle is closer to the left edge of the screen. Is it supposed to be like that?

To Reproduce

  1. Click on '+'
  2. Go to 'Add income/expense/transfer'
  3. Click on 'Created on' field

Expected behavior

No response

Screenshots

Screenshot_20241010-080654

App version

v2024.10.06-201 from Google Play

Smartphone

Google Pixel 6a

Additional context

No response

@adanyl0v adanyl0v added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 10, 2024
@adanyl0v adanyl0v changed the title The time circle has a non-centralized position [BUG] The time circle has a non-centralized position Oct 10, 2024
@ivywallet
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you @adanyl0v for raising Issue #3599! 🚀
What's next? Read our Contribution Guidelines 📚.

Tagging @ILIYANGERMANOV for review & approval 👀

@ILIYANGERMANOV ILIYANGERMANOV added the approved Approved by the Ivy Wallet team. Ready for dev label Oct 10, 2024
@p42rthicle
Copy link
Contributor

I'm on it

@ivywallet
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for your interest @p42rthicle! 🎉
Issue #3599 is assigned to you. You can work on it! ✅

If you don't want to work on it now, please un-assign yourself so other contributors can take it.

Also, make sure to read our Contribution Guidelines.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Approved by the Ivy Wallet team. Ready for dev bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants