-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(#1582): Add support for CIP-100 on vote metadata #1603
fix(#1582): Add support for CIP-100 on vote metadata #1603
Conversation
f57b263
to
acc3ee1
Compare
c140d15
to
a9b0a17
Compare
a9b0a17
to
f880076
Compare
}); | ||
const jsonld = await generateJsonld(body, CIP_100_CONTEXT, CIP_100); | ||
|
||
const canonizedJson = await canonizeJSON(jsonld); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The need for canonising was removed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we get rid of all the canonized jsons then (GA and DRep metadatas)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, for all metadata
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I apologise, this must have slipped through the cracks in our communications
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is not problem at all 🫡
08e8a57
to
6d0fac5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please re-verify this pr? 💪
LGTM!
List of changes
Checklist