Add a new predicate failure for non-matching withdrawals #4640
Labels
💳 technical-debt
Issues related to technical debt we introduced
dijkstra
Ledger era that will follow after Conway
Current predicate failure that checks whether withdrawal matches the amount in the reward account is totally misleading. It is reported as
WithdrawalsNotInRewardsCERTS
, which is also the predicate failure that is used for reporting non-existent reward accounts. We need to create proper predicate failure for that and also fix the name and refactorvalidateZeroRewards
function, cause that is even more misleading.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: