Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nuke live scene #1310

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 3, 2022
Merged

Conversation

lucienfostier
Copy link
Contributor

@lucienfostier lucienfostier commented Nov 3, 2022

Features

  • Add LiveScene support for Nuke (Nuke live scene #1310)
    • LiveSceneKnob: Knob to interface with LiveScene from Python
    • LiveSceneHolder: Node to hold LiveSceneKnob to provide a Python interface with LiveScene.

Related Issues

  • List any Issues this PR addresses or solves

Dependencies

  • List any other unmerged PRs that this PR depends on

Breaking Changes

  • List any breaking API/ABI changes

Checklist

  • I have read the contribution guidelines.
  • I have updated the documentation, if applicable.
  • I have tested my change(s) in the test suite, and added new test cases where necessary.
  • My code follows the Cortex project's prevailing coding style and conventions.

…ath::Box3d and Imath::M44d to DD::Image::Matrix4.
We want to maintain the world space matrix instead of transforming the points
so we can more easily round trip scene cache in/out of nuke.
This allows to write the bounds as the SceneInterface expects ( local space ).

Due to some kind of reset happening in the SourceGeo source code, we need to store
the matrix in create_geometry and apply in the geometry_engine.

I think this should work fine considering that Op are instantiate per output context ( frame )
so we shouldn't have a clash in the map data structure.
Allow to query the Nuke's scene representation through the SceneInterface API.
@ivanimanishi ivanimanishi merged commit 20c5800 into ImageEngine:RB-10.3 Nov 3, 2022
ivanimanishi added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants