✨ Add profiling middleware to simcore services

[bisgaard-itis]

What do these changes do?

• Move existing profiling middleware from api-server to service_lib[fastapi]
• Implement profiling middleware for aiohttp services.
• Enable profiling middleware in debug mode (local deployment) and on master for the following services:
  • storage
  • webserver
  • catalog
  • dynamic-scheduler
  • director-v2
• The following PR ensures will enable these features in master deployments: https://git.speag.com/oSparc/osparc-ops-deployment-configuration/-/merge_requests/567

Related issue/s

• File uploads using the new-style api are getting errors related to search for filename #5729

How to test

1. run make build-devel && make up-devel
2. In portainer, find the port on which storage is exposed.
3. To profile the endpoint GET /v0/status in storage, run the following in bash:

curl -G 127.0.0.1:<storage port>/v0/status -H 'x-profile: true' | jq .profile -r

Here's an example of what that produces:

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 34.66667% with 49 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.4%. Comparing base (cafbf96) to head (5b33d02).
Report is 170 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #5749      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage    84.5%   87.4%    +2.8%     
=========================================
  Files          10    1366    +1356     
  Lines         214   56562   +56348     
  Branches       25    1285    +1260     
=========================================
+ Hits          181   49476   +49295     
- Misses         23    6812    +6789     
- Partials       10     274     +264     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	63.9% <66.6%> (?)
unittests	85.5% <34.6%> (+0.9%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
...rvice-library/src/servicelib/mimetype_constants.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...er/src/simcore_service_api_server/core/settings.py	90.4% <100.0%> (ø)
...talog/src/simcore_service_catalog/core/settings.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...2/src/simcore_service_director_v2/core/settings.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...core_service_dynamic_scheduler/core/application.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...simcore_service_dynamic_scheduler/core/settings.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...storage/src/simcore_service_storage/application.py	83.9% <100.0%> (ø)
...es/storage/src/simcore_service_storage/settings.py	97.5% <100.0%> (ø)
...erver/src/simcore_service_webserver/application.py	98.1% <100.0%> (ø)
.../simcore_service_webserver/application_settings.py	98.2% <100.0%> (ø)
... and 7 more

... and 1327 files with indirect coverage changes

[matusdrobuliak66]

🥇

[mrnicegyu11]

Very nice, concise and readable.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud