🐛 Restores compatibility with deprecated storage API used in legacy services

[pcrespov]

What do these changes do?

Some legacy tests fail with

because deprecated client expects data field always as an object as can be seen here

osparc-simcore/services/storage/client-sdk/python/simcore_service_storage_sdk/models/file_meta_data_enveloped.py

Lines 33 to 38 in cfdf4f8

	"""
	openapi_types = {
	'data': 'FileMetaDataType',
	'error': 'object'
	}

Related issue/s

• Reverts some changes from PR ♻️ Cleanup of api-server #5659
• Fixes Legacy services fail to start #5676

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[sanderegg]

thanks for going back

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.0%. Comparing base (cafbf96) to head (87637bb).
Report is 115 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head 87637bb differs from pull request most recent head 431a904. Consider uploading reports for the commit 431a904 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #5679      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage    84.5%   65.0%   -19.5%     
=========================================
  Files          10     555     +545     
  Lines         214   27905   +27691     
  Branches       25     204     +179     
=========================================
+ Hits          181   18165   +17984     
- Misses         23    9688    +9665     
- Partials       10      52      +42     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	65.0% <ø> (?)
unittests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 565 files with indirect coverage changes

[GitHK]

👍 thanks for taking care of it

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.3% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[GitHK]

👍