You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I couldn't find anything related to this, so I think nobody has asked for it.
Do you plan to introduce the [] operator for the array type?
I feel like the array index operator would be convenient in some cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Evalexpr doesn't really support arrays. If you want to, you can make a pull
request. But I am not sure how much time I have for reviewing at the moment
...
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, 15.51 BijanVeyssi, ***@***.***> wrote:
I couldn't find anything related to this, so I think nobody has asked for
it.
Do you plan to introduce the [] operator for the array type? I am fully
aware that .get exists for the array type.
However, I feel like the array index operator would be more convenient in
some cases.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#154>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AASATXROAGMDMXFOLZHIRJDYDYWNFAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7GGVI2WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZRHE4DONRWHE3DEMQ>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
I couldn't find anything related to this, so I think nobody has asked for it.
Do you plan to introduce the [] operator for the array type?
I feel like the array index operator would be convenient in some cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: