-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 490
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Search/Browse: Improve facet UI for dates in fields such as "Publication Date" #70
Comments
Review production data to figure out what the best range is. For post 4.0 |
I'd like this date range slider to be like this where a user can either enter a range or slide to their preferred range: @posixeleni could you identify the metadata fields that would need a date range slider? |
The following fields can benefit from the date range slider: In the Citation Metadata
But there are also compound fields with start and end dates that we can use the slider for:
In the Astronomy Metadata:
|
@eaquigley I like how that slider looks but I'm not sure it's compatible with JSF. There are a variety of Primefaces sliders here that may be of interest: http://www.primefaces.org/showcase/ui/input/slider.xhtml I'd also like to point out that this issue has a hard dependency on #370 so that the data is available to Solr as numbers and dates rather than text. |
Feedback via @thegaryking at https://help.hmdc.harvard.edu/Ticket/Display.html?id=232324 "at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/GovDept why is there a list of dates that goes only up to 2013 even though the individual items go until 2016? see screenshot" It's probably time to take "finalize" out of the title of this issue. I'll try to come up with a better title. We should probably make this issue specifically about date ranges even though it depends on figuring proper indexing of range values as described in #370. |
Including notes from and closing a similar, duplicate ticket #370. That also includes ranges for numbers generally such as wavelength. |
From #370: [Phil] |
Removing from 4.5, will be reprioritized for a future release. |
The other day @rtreacy passed along some feedback to me from someone who looked at https://dataverse.harvard.edu and remarked something to the effect of "It looks like there's only old data here because it's 2018 and I don't see anything newer than 2016 under 'Publication Date'." If you click "More..." a couple times, you can tell there is in fact data from 2017 and 2018, but I'm sure we could do a better job with date facets like this: For all facets we show a count with the highest number on top but for dates it would probably be more interesting to see "all time" vs. "last five years" vs. "last six months" or whatever. |
Over at #4977 @philippconzett suggests that we simply sort the publication year facet chronologically. There was also a little discussion with @mdmADA about date facets at #4908 (comment) |
Closing in favor of #4977. |
…LTI_LIC Merged back develop
remove > for english interface
Author Name: Philip Durbin (@pdurbin)
Original Redmine Issue: 3478, https://redmine.hmdc.harvard.edu/issues/3478
Original Date: 2014-02-03
Original Assignee: Philip Durbin
Date facets in DVN 3.x are sorted by count:
Production Date
2002 (2261)
1996 (1717)
1988 (424)
2010 (371)
2009 (314)
We should probably order by date:
2013-2014 (4)
2011-2012 (3)
Do we like this? Should we have a larger "span" than 2 years? What should the UI look like? Should there be a slider?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: