You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Updating datasets that are migrated with their own DOIs. See "Support for Using Multiple PID Providers" section of release notes for v6.2 of Dataverse and links in that section.
No custom metadata block to bring over
Cost for this migration service from HDV?
They may have an interest in their own installation at some point but it doesn't seem feasible at the moment
Thanks again for meeting with us in October, and apologies for the delay following up with you all. The internal planning process at Emory has moved even slower than I initially expected given our February 1 drop dead date for access to the UNC Dataverse.
We’re currently building our case for choosing Option 2, per the attached quote that UNC provided us with their transition options. Would you also be able to provide an estimate of how much it would cost for your team at Harvard to work with the UNC team to receive our current Emory Dataverse collection? Is there any additional information you would need from Emory or UNC to provide the estimated cost and a general timeline?
Issue:
UNC services are changing and Emory is interested in migrating their university collection to HDV
Around 66MG of data total
Migration concerns
Contacts:
[email protected]
[email protected]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: