-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixing error from Climatic maps> Themes background #8383
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fixing error from Climatic maps> Themes background #8383
Conversation
updating branch
@NanyanziAlice have you been able to check this? |
@rdstern |
@anastasia-mbithe is this resolved now? |
Hi @N-thony, yes, for this issue it was done. The other was a different discussion/issue we wanted to get Roger's view, still on the same dialog. |
Ok, @derekagorhom can you peer review this? Thanks |
@anastasia-mbithe |
@derekagorhom are you happy to take this over? and probably discuss with @anastasia-mbithe on what is needed/remaining here? |
@N-thony sorry for bring this here on this PR, but since this PR attempts to fix the theme issue i felt here so better. Here is when you fill the panel.border option Here is when you dont fill the panel.border option Is it ok if we disable the panel.border option for the user? |
@derekagorhom does this require @rdstern input? |
@Patowhiz i think Roger can weight in, |
@derekagorhom thanks for your willingness to take on this task. Having reviewed the issue and PR, it appears to be primarily a technical matter that doesn't need @rdstern's involvement at this stage. It's my belief that completely disabling the feature without a comprehensive grasp of the underlying problem might not be the most prudent approach. I would like to suggest that you delve into the R ggplot package, paying particular attention to the panel options, to gain a deeper understanding of why the script generated by the sub-dialog is triggering the issue described. Subsequently, I encourage you to scrutinize the alterations implemented in this PR to assess if they indeed address the issue in the most appropriate manner. If these changes prove inadequate, I suggest you create a new PR that attempts to fix the issue. Your insights and feedback on this matter would be greatly valued as they will contribute to our progress. Thanks. |
Fixes #8345
This is ready for review.
Though I didn't manage to test this since I didn't get any shapefile data with the geometry parameter, maybe @NanyanziAlice can do the first test.