[WIP] Activating Pyomo linear presolve for IDAES models

[andrewlee94]

Fixes None

Summary/Motivation:

This PR builds on previous work to bring the new Pyomo solver interfaces into IDAES and activates the use of the new linear presolver.

All core code (core and models) has been updated to use the presolver, however many parts of models_extra have issues relating to the pre-solver.

• TSA models: linear presolve results in an "invalid value in AMPL evaluation" exception during initialization. Presovle has been disabled.

• Tray column and associated models show at least two different initialization failures. Given the current state of these model, this should be addressed by a complete overhaul of the tray column code. Presolve has been disabled.

• Gas-Solid Contactors: BFB and FB01 have issues with presolve. Disabled presolve.

• Power Generation:

  • test_NG_PR.py: test_gibbs is poorly written and fails to work (and we are lucky it worked until now). xfailed.

Changes proposed in this PR:

Legal Acknowledgement

By contributing to this software project, I agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution:

1. I agree my contributions are submitted under the license terms described in the LICENSE.txt file at the top level of this directory.
2. I represent I am authorized to make the contributions and grant the license. If my employer has rights to intellectual property that includes these contributions, I represent that I have received permission to make contributions and grant the required license on behalf of that employer.

[AlexNoring]

@Daison2102 @AlexNoring If you have some time, it would be appreciated if you could look into why the TSA initialization fails with the presolver. It appears that one of the steps results in an invalid value that causes an exception in AMPL (at first guess, I suspect a value is being fixed to a singular point).

For now, I have set the TSA initializer to not use the presolver.

@andrewlee94 The TSA tests pass for me when I set heating_time_guess to 400 for the TestTsaPolystyrene class.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 37.61468% with 68 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.68%. Comparing base (2ac6417) to head (f39ccdf).
Report is 27 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...s/subcritical_power_plant/steam_cycle_flowsheet.py	6.06%	31 Missing ⚠️
...rcritical_steam_cycle/supercritical_steam_cycle.py	0.00%	23 Missing ⚠️
idaes/core/solvers/config.py	50.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
idaes/models_extra/column_models/condenser.py	50.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
idaes/models_extra/column_models/reboiler.py	50.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
idaes/models_extra/column_models/tray_column.py	50.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...d_contactors/unit_models/bubbling_fluidized_bed.py	50.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...a/gas_solid_contactors/unit_models/fixed_bed_0D.py	50.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1415      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.80%   77.68%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files         393      393              
  Lines       64797    64837      +40     
  Branches    14390    14404      +14     
==========================================
- Hits        50413    50368      -45     
- Misses      11794    11855      +61     
- Partials     2590     2614      +24     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[andrewlee94]

Closing in favour of #1436. This PR tried to do too much at once and ran into backward compatibility issues.