Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 9, 2023. It is now read-only.

Imaging Type should be a Lookup List #998

Closed
garylm opened this issue Mar 17, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Imaging Type should be a Lookup List #998

garylm opened this issue Mar 17, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@garylm
Copy link

garylm commented Mar 17, 2017

Expected behavior:
It makes sense to have a "fixed" or set list of possible imaging types to be requested, rather than allowing random text entries. There is a note field that allows additional specific information, if needed.

Actual behavior:
Currently a general text field.

Also, any reporting on imaging will be subject to the randomness of whatever way users describe the requests.

@jkleinsc
Copy link
Member

@garylm Imaging types are tied to the Imaging Pricing Type lookup list, but they are
managed as pricing items and by default all users can add new imaging types. If you want to turn off the capability for all users to add new types, you do so by editing the Imaging Pricing Type lookup list and unchecking the checkbox labeled User Can Add New Values.

Editing of the imaging types can be accomplished by going to /pricing/imaging.

BTW lab types work the same way.

@garylm
Copy link
Author

garylm commented Mar 20, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants