Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

serialosc: fix build on Linux #99919

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

cho-m
Copy link
Member

@cho-m cho-m commented Apr 23, 2022

  • Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
  • Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
  • Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
  • Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

Blocked until #99918

@cho-m cho-m added do not merge CI-no-bottles Merge without publishing bottles labels Apr 23, 2022
@BrewTestBot BrewTestBot added the no Linux bottle Formula has no Linux bottle label Apr 23, 2022
@cho-m cho-m force-pushed the serialosc-linux branch from 001c6a1 to e95722d Compare April 23, 2022 18:00
@cho-m cho-m force-pushed the serialosc-linux branch from e95722d to 8c6c978 Compare April 23, 2022 18:23
@cho-m cho-m marked this pull request as ready for review April 23, 2022 19:01
@BrewTestBot
Copy link
Member

🤖 A scheduled task has triggered a merge.

@cho-m cho-m deleted the serialosc-linux branch April 24, 2022 09:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI-no-bottles Merge without publishing bottles no Linux bottle Formula has no Linux bottle
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants