ble-sh/blesh 0.3.2 (new formula)

[pthariensflame]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install <formula>)? see note

---

audit fails with only one error, and that one is unavoidable: there are files in lib that shouldn't be there. Unfortunately, for this particular software, they should be there, and if they're moved then the top-level script can't find them anymore.

[BrewTestBot]

• GitHub repository not notable enough (<30 forks, <30 watchers and <75 stars)

[akinomyoga]

audit fails with only one error, and that one is unavoidable: there are files in lib that shouldn't be there. Unfortunately, for this particular software, they should be there, and if they're moved then the top-level script can't find them anymore.

The directory lib in the install target does not correspond to the directory something like /usr/local/lib but to /usr/local/share/blesh/lib. I'm not familiar with homebrew philosophy, but I guess this should be something like the following:

Suggested change

	system Formula["make"].bin/"gmake", "INSDIR=#{prefix}", "install"
	system Formula["make"].bin/"gmake", "INSDIR=#{prefix}/share/blesh", "install"

[SMillerDev]

Hi, this seems like a nice software, but not notable enough for us to package in Homebrew for now. This is not a decision on the merits of the software, but we cannot distribute every single piece of software and have to draw a line on “notability” somewhere. Of course, we would be happy to reconsider in the future.

Please consider hosting it in a personal tap, which is very easy to do: https://docs.brew.sh/How-to-Create-and-Maintain-a-Tap