Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use uint dtype for ant numbers to comply with pyuvdata #925

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

steven-murray
Copy link
Contributor

This applies the patch suggested by @mkolopanis here.

Basically it allow the antenna numbers to be np.uint type instead of basic int.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 6, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c2f2c41) 97.18% compared to head (4d31ff2) 97.18%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #925   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.18%   97.18%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines       10504    10504           
=======================================
  Hits        10208    10208           
  Misses        296      296           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 97.18% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@steven-murray steven-murray reopened this Dec 6, 2023
@steven-murray steven-murray marked this pull request as draft December 6, 2023 18:24
@steven-murray
Copy link
Contributor Author

Leaving this as draft in case we wanna do the "right" thing later.

@jsdillon
Copy link
Member

jsdillon commented Dec 6, 2023

I'm not convinced that this is the "right" thing... I much prefer the other solution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants