Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
H5Lexists docs: Removed reference to 1.8.16 since the change is the 1…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
….8.x releases, HDFFV-11289 (#1335)
  • Loading branch information
brtnfld authored Jan 11, 2022
1 parent f8f1fef commit 54237d7
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions src/H5Lpublic.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ H5_DLL herr_t H5Lget_val_by_idx(hid_t loc_id, const char *group_name, H5_index_t
* name includes either a relative path or an absolute path to the
* target link, intermediate steps along the path must be verified
* before the existence of the target link can be safely checked. If
* the path is not verified and an intermediate element of the path
* the path is not verified, and an intermediate element of the path
* does not exist, H5Lexists() will fail. The example in the next
* paragraph illustrates one step-by-step method for verifying the
* existence of a link with a relative or absolute path.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -620,13 +620,13 @@ H5_DLL herr_t H5Lget_val_by_idx(hid_t loc_id, const char *group_name, H5_index_t
* H5Lexists() with arguments \c file, \c "/", and \c lapl
* returns a positive value; in other words,
* \Code{H5Lexists(file, "/", lapl)} returns a positive value.
* In HDF5 version 1.8.16, this function returns 0.</li>
* In the HDF5 1.8 release, this function returns 0.</li>
* <li>Let \c root denote a valid HDF5 group identifier that refers to the
* root group of an HDF5 file, and let \c lapl denote a valid link
* access property list identifier. A call to H5Lexists() with
* arguments c root, \c "/", and \c lapl returns a positive value;
* in other words, \Code{H5Lexists(root, "/", lapl)} returns a positive
* value. In HDF5 version 1.8.16, this function returns 0.</li>
* value. In the HDF5 1.8 release, this function returns 0.</li>
* </ol>
* Note that the function accepts link names and path names. This is
* potentially misleading to callers, and we plan to separate the
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 54237d7

Please sign in to comment.