Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: subquery test migrated from duckdb #4985

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 18, 2024

Conversation

CookiePieWw
Copy link
Collaborator

@CookiePieWw CookiePieWw commented Nov 13, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA.

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

#1168

What's changed and what's your intention?

As titile.

Only a few parts are migrated. Mostly because other parts are not available for greptimedb for these reasons:

  1. Datafusion does not support: scalar subquery, exists, pivot ...
  2. Different internal pre-defined tables, functions and types:
    • Tables: orders, lineitem ...
    • Functions: generate_series, gen_random_uuid ...
    • Types: array/list type
  3. Different grammar: duckdb uses query context differently,
    • e.g.SELECT (SELECT max((SELECT subq_0.c0 AS c1))) FROM (SELECT NULL AS c0) AS subq_0;
    • Seems the correct form for greptimedb is SELECT (SELECT max((SELECT subq_0.c0 AS c1 FROM (SELECT NULL AS c0) AS subq_0)));
    • (Query above is still not available since datafusion does not support Scalar subqueries yet)

Checklist

  • I have written the necessary rustdoc comments.
  • I have added the necessary unit tests and integration tests.
  • This PR requires documentation updates.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs-not-required This change does not impact docs. label Nov 13, 2024
@CookiePieWw CookiePieWw marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2024 03:23
@CookiePieWw CookiePieWw requested a review from a team as a code owner November 18, 2024 03:23
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.76%. Comparing base (3bf9981) to head (24bcea4).
Report is 21 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4985      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.05%   83.76%   -0.30%     
==========================================
  Files        1144     1148       +4     
  Lines      213324   214132     +808     
==========================================
+ Hits       179318   179361      +43     
- Misses      34006    34771     +765     

@WenyXu WenyXu requested a review from waynexia November 18, 2024 06:49
Copy link
Member

@WenyXu WenyXu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rest LGTM, @waynexia PTAL

Copy link
Member

@waynexia waynexia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

BTW, please state the original test file in duckdb, and which case(s) are skipped in *.sql file's header

@WenyXu
Copy link
Member

WenyXu commented Nov 18, 2024

@waynexia PTAL

@CookiePieWw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Updated with sources and skipped cases. Since they distributed seperately, so I add comments for skipped cases in where they should have been.

@WenyXu WenyXu added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into GreptimeTeam:main with commit 2b72e66 Nov 18, 2024
35 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs-not-required This change does not impact docs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants