-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Choose sustainable region for workloads #128
Closed
markus-gsf-seidl
wants to merge
4
commits into
Green-Software-Foundation:dev
from
markus-gsf-seidl:feature/74-region-selection
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ | ||
--- | ||
version: 1.0 | ||
submitted_by: markus-ntt-seidl | ||
published_date: TBD | ||
category: cloud | ||
tags: | ||
- cloud | ||
- role:cloud-engineer | ||
- size:small | ||
--- | ||
|
||
# Choose sustainable region for workloads | ||
|
||
## Description | ||
|
||
Applications can have background tasks or jobs that run independent to the rest of the application. These workloads can be put into a region that is the most sustainable region of the used cloud provider. | ||
|
||
## Solution | ||
|
||
Run the workloads in a region that the used cloud provider labels as most sustainable. Choose the region that is still near to your application so that data transfer to and from the sustainable region is minimal. | ||
|
||
## SCI Impact | ||
|
||
`SCI = (E * I) + M per R` | ||
[Software Carbon Intensity Spec](https://grnsft.org/sci) | ||
|
||
Concerning the SCI equation. choose sustainable region for workloads will impact two parts: | ||
|
||
- `E`: Transferring the necessary data to the sustainable region and back to the application region will increase the energy consumed by the system | ||
- `I`: Location based carbon emissions will be reduced as the workload is executed in a more sustainable region as the original region | ||
|
||
## Assumptions | ||
|
||
markus-gsf-seidl marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
- This optimization assumes that the workload can be run in an additional region and the transfer of the necessary data from and to the region is still better, in terms of CO2, than running the workload in the original region | ||
- Running workloads in a different region can increase latency in scheduling tasks and retrieving results | ||
|
||
## Considerations | ||
|
||
- Consider moving your application to the most sustainable region | ||
- Consider running the workload at times where energy is produced from renewable resources | ||
|
||
## References | ||
|
||
- [AWS Sustainability Region Selection](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/wellarchitected/latest/sustainability-pillar/region-selection.html) |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about M? From the other pattern: M: By reducing the total number of computing equipment traversed, the total embodied carbon is lower.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with @greenhsu123 that this would also affect M.