Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

config: split .compression_lru_size for data and metablocks #278

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

Gottox
Copy link
Owner

@Gottox Gottox commented Aug 9, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 55.55556% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 64.75%. Comparing base (458bd66) to head (166bf78).

Files Patch % Lines
libsqsh/src/archive/archive.c 55.55% 0 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #278      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   64.76%   64.75%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          74       74              
  Lines        5535     5541       +6     
  Branches      830      833       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         3585     3588       +3     
  Misses       1471     1471              
- Partials      479      482       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Gottox Gottox force-pushed the add/split_lru_for_data_and_metablock branch from 166bf78 to 1186d24 Compare August 9, 2024 17:40
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 9, 2024

@Gottox Gottox merged commit cb0c39a into main Aug 9, 2024
16 checks passed
@Gottox Gottox deleted the add/split_lru_for_data_and_metablock branch August 9, 2024 17:44
@Dr-Emann
Copy link
Contributor

Should this have done something with the _reserved field?

@Dr-Emann Dr-Emann mentioned this pull request Aug 17, 2024
@Gottox
Copy link
Owner Author

Gottox commented Aug 17, 2024

You are right, memcpy will do an out of bondse read, i totally forgot about that. Nonetheless, I'll keep the field as it is and instead change memcpy. Thanks for noticing that!

@Gottox
Copy link
Owner Author

Gottox commented Aug 18, 2024

Fixed in #291

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants