-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added poc way of dealing with docker auth issues #1421
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So why not overload the credentials and mount them as the normal creds in
/secret
as well as in/root/.docker/config.json
?In my case this allowed me to set the
kanikoSecret: ~/.docker/config.json
inside of the kaniko builder configuration.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting idea. My thoughts:
1.) However there is no way both can work. What if you want to build two artifacts, one with a GCR repo, the other one using Docker? The first would want to use the
GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS
env var, the latter would use the config.json.2.) based on https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/kaniko#pushing-to-amazon-ecr I see that it should be /kaniko/.docker/config.json and could be a configmap... @priyawadhwa can you advise?
3.) What if we introduce a
mountDockerConfig
boolean flag, by defaultfalse
and adockerConfigPath:
string flag pointing to~/.docker/config.json
by default instead?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup option 3 SGTM -- basically skaffold.yaml should have separate options for registry specific credentials and the dockerconfig in case both are needed, as @balopat said. We could create a configmap or another secret (probably better) for the dockerconfig and mount it into
/kaniko/.docker/config.json
(that's where kaniko expects to find it)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the delay. I wasn't intending for the configuration to be reused, I only did it to simplify the work required to test the concept. Realistically option 3 is probably be the best.