Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Pin the version of the bridge_service_perimeter #268

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2022
Merged

fix: Pin the version of the bridge_service_perimeter #268

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2022

Conversation

LuizSDCit
Copy link
Collaborator

@LuizSDCit LuizSDCit commented Jan 17, 2022

Fixes #267

Pin the version of the bridge_service_perimeter to avoid the for_each error in the new version of bridge_service_perimeter.

  • Tests pass
  • Appropriate changes to README are included in PR

@LuizSDCit LuizSDCit changed the title fix: pin the version of the bridge_service_perimeter fix: Pin the version of the bridge_service_perimeter Jan 17, 2022
@LuizSDCit LuizSDCit marked this pull request as ready for review January 17, 2022 14:39
@bharathkkb bharathkkb merged commit af9a522 into GoogleCloudPlatform:main Jan 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Backward incompatible change in upstream module block deployment
2 participants