-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add SOA to root-level record deletion exception #6724
Add SOA to root-level record deletion exception #6724
Conversation
When trying to delete record-sets that are managed by terraform, some record types can't be deleted by DNS and API restrictions. (It doesn't make sense to delete the Start Of Authority (SOA) or root-level NS records by themselves as they're fundamental to the zone construct – their value can be changed, but they must exist for the zone itself to exist.) The code previously only pretended deletes for root-level NS records. This change adds SOA to that behavior so that terraform delete/destroy can function properly when SOA is managed. See issue hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#12827
Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information. For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request. |
Hello! I am a robot who works on Magic Modules PRs. I've detected that you're a community contributor. @melinath, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to assist you and help review your changes. ❓ First time contributing? Click here for more detailsYour assigned reviewer will help review your code by:
You can help make sure that review is quick by running local tests and ensuring they're passing in between each push you make to your PR's branch. Also, try to leave a comment with each push you make, as pushes generally don't generate emails. If your reviewer doesn't get back to you within a week after your most recent change, please feel free to leave a comment on the issue asking them to take a look! In the absence of a dedicated review dashboard most maintainers manage their pending reviews through email, and those will sometimes get lost in their inbox. |
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are. Terraform GA: Diff ( 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)) |
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Action takenTriggering VCR tests in RECORDING mode for the tests that failed during VCR. Click here to see the failed testsTestAccFirebaserulesRelease_BasicRelease|TestAccBigtableAppProfile_bigtableAppProfileSingleclusterExample|TestAccBigtableAppProfile_bigtableAppProfileAnyclusterExample|TestAccBigtableAppProfile_bigtableAppProfileMulticlusterExample|TestAccBigQueryDataTable_bigtable |
Tests passed during RECORDING mode: All tests passed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Confirmed via the product docs that this behavior is the same for NS and SOA records: https://cloud.google.com/dns/docs/records#remove_a_record
Could you please add a test for SOA behavior that would've caught this? Probably similar to TestAccDNSRecordSet_secondaryNS
mmv1/third_party/terraform/resources/resource_dns_record_set.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Stephen Lewis (Burrows) <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
re-marking as changes requested since there's still more work to do from the previous review.
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are. Terraform GA: Diff ( 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)) |
Tests analyticsTotal tests: All tests passed in REPLAYING mode |
Hi @melinath, since this PR is stale: |
yep! |
assuming this is still an issue. |
@melinath yeah, we just ran into it :D |
This has been merged in #10559, thus this PR can be closed, right? Thanks for the smooth and straight forward process @SarahFrench! |
seems like it! |
Added SOA to the google_dns_record_set types that are faux-deleted.
When trying to delete record-sets that are managed by terraform, some types can't actually be deleted by DNS and API restrictions. The code previously only pretended deletes for root-level NS records. This change adds SOA to that behavior so that terraform delete/destroy can function properly when SOA is explicitly managed.
(It doesn't make sense to delete the Start Of Authority (SOA) or root-level NS records by themselves as they're fundamental to the zone construct – their value can be changed, but they must exist for the zone itself to exist.)
This problem would only manifest when managing SOA as a google_dns_record_set resource in terraform with custom values. If left unspecified/implied (default) as part of the zone resource, the zone resource already correctly bypasses deletion of the SOA record on deletion.
See issue hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#12827
This PR is for Terraform, and I acknowledge that I have:
make test
andmake lint
to ensure it passes unit and linter tests. See belowI did build the terraform-provider-google successfully, but
make test
andlint
in the resultant provider failed due togoogle/resource_compute_subnetwork.go:39:22: undefined: cidr
issues (not any code I touched).main
(without my change)make test
fails for me (possibly, my dev environment is not correct). I reached a limit with how much I was willing to pursue tests on my own given the 2 line of code proposed change.I have not run acceptance tests as earlier tests failed. I'm willing to give it another go.
Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)