Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hive require partition filter for Bigquery Table #4629

Merged

Conversation

slevenick
Copy link
Contributor

Upstreams: hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#8775

If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:

  • Searched through the issue tracker for an open issue that this either resolves or contributes to, commented on it to claim it, and written "fixes {url}" or "part of {url}" in this PR description. If there were no relevant open issues, I opened one and commented that I would like to work on it (not necessary for very small changes).
  • Generated Terraform, and ran make test and make lint to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.
  • Ensured that all new fields I added that can be set by a user appear in at least one example (for generated resources) or third_party test (for handwritten resources or update tests).
  • Ran relevant acceptance tests (If the acceptance tests do not yet pass or you are unable to run them, please let your reviewer know).
  • Read the Release Notes Guide before writing my release note below.

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)

bigquery: added `require_partition_filter` field to `google_bigquery_table` when provisioning `hive_partitioning_options`

@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Mar 29, 2021

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and then comment @googlebot I fixed it.. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: no label Mar 29, 2021
@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff ( 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

I have triggered VCR tests based on this PR's diffs. See the results here: "https://ci-oss.hashicorp.engineering/viewQueued.html?itemId=179550"

@slevenick
Copy link
Contributor Author

/gcbrun

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff ( 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

I have triggered VCR tests based on this PR's diffs. See the results here: "https://ci-oss.hashicorp.engineering/viewQueued.html?itemId=179574"

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

I have triggered VCR tests in RECORDING mode for the following tests that failed during VCR: TestAccApiGatewayApiConfig_apigatewayApiConfigBasicExample|TestAccBigQueryTable_HivePartitioning|TestAccBigQueryTable_HivePartitioningCustomSchema|TestAccNotebooksInstance_notebookInstanceFullExample You can view the result here: "https://ci-oss.hashicorp.engineering/viewQueued.html?itemId=179585"

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests failed during RECORDING mode: TestAccNotebooksInstance_notebookInstanceFullExample Please fix these to complete your PR

@aabf
Copy link

aabf commented Mar 31, 2021

@slevenick Do I need to do something in this PR? I don't understand what is the generate-diffs and why is falling.
Thank you

@slevenick slevenick requested review from a team and c2thorn and removed request for a team March 31, 2021 20:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants