Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Validate on deleted IAM members #2731

Merged

Conversation

slevenick
Copy link
Contributor

Depends on
hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#4957
hashicorp/terraform-provider-google-beta#1416

Validates that members do not start with deleted:

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)


@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician, I work on Magic Modules.
I see that this PR has already had some downstream PRs generated. Any open downstreams are already updated to your most recent commit, db252f8.

Pull request statuses

No diff detected in terraform-google-conversion.
No diff detected in Ansible.
No diff detected in Inspec.

New Pull Requests

I built this PR into one or more new PRs on other repositories, and when those are closed, this PR will also be merged and closed.
depends: hashicorp/terraform-provider-google-beta#1417
depends: hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#4958

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician, I work on Magic Modules.
I see that this PR has already had some downstream PRs generated. Any open downstreams are already updated to your most recent commit, d52d3d9.

Pull request statuses

terraform-provider-google-beta already has an open PR.
No diff detected in terraform-google-conversion.
terraform-provider-google already has an open PR.
No diff detected in Ansible.
No diff detected in Inspec.

New Pull Requests

I didn't open any new pull requests because of this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@danawillow danawillow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you also want to add this to binding and member?

Elem: &schema.Schema{Type: schema.TypeString},
Elem: &schema.Schema{
Type: schema.TypeString,
ValidateFunc: validation.StringDoesNotMatch(regexp.MustCompile("^deleted:"), "Terraform does not support deleted IAM members"),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to make it super extra clear, maybe something like "Terraform does not support IAM bindings for deleted users", so people don't get the wrong impression that they can't delete people from their policies.

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician, I work on Magic Modules.
I see that this PR has already had some downstream PRs generated. Any open downstreams are already updated to your most recent commit, d52d3d9.

Pull request statuses

terraform-provider-google-beta already has an open PR.
No diff detected in terraform-google-conversion.
terraform-provider-google already has an open PR.
No diff detected in Ansible.
No diff detected in Inspec.

New Pull Requests

I didn't open any new pull requests because of this PR.

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician, I work on Magic Modules.
I see that this PR has already had some downstream PRs generated. Any open downstreams are already updated to your most recent commit, 5791fdd.

Pull request statuses

terraform-provider-google-beta already has an open PR.
No diff detected in terraform-google-conversion.
terraform-provider-google already has an open PR.
No diff detected in Ansible.
No diff detected in Inspec.

New Pull Requests

I didn't open any new pull requests because of this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@danawillow danawillow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, looks also like TPG got a race condition so you'll probably need to regenerate before merging.

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician, I work on Magic Modules.
I see that this PR has already had some downstream PRs generated. Any open downstreams are already updated to your most recent commit, 5caf15e.

Pull request statuses

terraform-provider-google-beta already has an open PR.
No diff detected in terraform-google-conversion.
terraform-provider-google already has an open PR.
No diff detected in Ansible.
No diff detected in Inspec.

New Pull Requests

I didn't open any new pull requests because of this PR.

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician, I work on Magic Modules.
I see that this PR has already had some downstream PRs generated. Any open downstreams are already updated to your most recent commit, ffaf8f3.

Pull request statuses

terraform-provider-google-beta already has an open PR.
No diff detected in terraform-google-conversion.
terraform-provider-google already has an open PR.
No diff detected in Ansible.
No diff detected in Inspec.

New Pull Requests

I didn't open any new pull requests because of this PR.

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician, I work on Magic Modules.
I see that this PR has already had some downstream PRs generated. Any open downstreams are already updated to your most recent commit, 88ad9f9.

Pull request statuses

terraform-provider-google-beta already has an open PR.
No diff detected in terraform-google-conversion.
terraform-provider-google already has an open PR.
No diff detected in Ansible.
No diff detected in Inspec.

New Pull Requests

I didn't open any new pull requests because of this PR.

slevenick and others added 3 commits November 22, 2019 19:36
Tracked submodules are build/terraform-beta build/terraform-mapper build/terraform build/ansible build/inspec.
@modular-magician modular-magician merged commit 79f8532 into GoogleCloudPlatform:master Nov 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants