Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump GKE node pool GPU disk to an appropriate size. #2505

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2019

Conversation

rileykarson
Copy link
Member

Fixes TestAccContainerNodePool_withGPU

Failing with:

Error: Error waiting for creating GKE NodePool: Google Compute Engine: Invalid value for field 'resource.properties.disks[0].initializeParams.diskSizeGb': '10'. Disk cannot be smaller than the chosen image 'gke-1147-gke10-cos-u-73-11647-293-0-v191004-pre-nvda-gpu' (15.0 GB).

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)


@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician, I work on Magic Modules.
I see that this PR has already had some downstream PRs generated. Any open downstreams are already updated to your most recent commit, 279c78c.

Pull request statuses

No diff detected in terraform-google-conversion.
No diff detected in Ansible.
No diff detected in Inspec.

New Pull Requests

I built this PR into one or more new PRs on other repositories, and when those are closed, this PR will also be merged and closed.
depends: hashicorp/terraform-provider-google-beta#1285
depends: hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#4727

Tracked submodules are build/terraform-beta build/terraform-mapper build/terraform build/ansible build/inspec.
@modular-magician modular-magician merged commit 49d3c3f into GoogleCloudPlatform:master Oct 22, 2019
JanMa pushed a commit to JanMa/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2019
JanMa added a commit to JanMa/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants