Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add performance config field to Filestore instance #12245

Merged

Conversation

yaelbarak
Copy link
Member

Performance configuration support for Filestore.

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)

filestore: added `performance_config` field to `google_filestore_instance`

@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from SarahFrench November 5, 2024 14:01
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Hello! I am a robot. Tests will require approval from a repository maintainer to run.

@SarahFrench, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to review your changes. If you have not received review feedback within 2 business days, please leave a comment on this PR asking them to take a look.

You can help make sure that review is quick by doing a self-review and by running impacted tests locally.

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes:

Diff report

Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

google provider: Diff ( 3 files changed, 380 insertions(+))
google-beta provider: Diff ( 3 files changed, 380 insertions(+))
terraform-google-conversion: Diff ( 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests analytics

Total tests: 13
Passed tests: 12
Skipped tests: 0
Affected tests: 1

Click here to see the affected service packages
  • filestore

Action taken

Found 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
  • TestAccFilestoreInstance_performanceConfig

Get to know how VCR tests work

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

🔴 Tests failed during RECORDING mode:
TestAccFilestoreInstance_performanceConfig [Error message] [Debug log]

🔴 Errors occurred during RECORDING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR.

View the build log or the debug log for each test

@yaelbarak yaelbarak force-pushed the filestore_performance_config branch from 8d0fb0a to 0912ac8 Compare November 5, 2024 14:21
@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes:

Diff report

Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

google provider: Diff ( 3 files changed, 380 insertions(+))
google-beta provider: Diff ( 3 files changed, 380 insertions(+))
terraform-google-conversion: Diff ( 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests analytics

Total tests: 13
Passed tests: 12
Skipped tests: 0
Affected tests: 1

Click here to see the affected service packages
  • filestore

Action taken

Found 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
  • TestAccFilestoreInstance_performanceConfig

Get to know how VCR tests work

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

🔴 Tests failed during RECORDING mode:
TestAccFilestoreInstance_performanceConfig [Error message] [Debug log]

🔴 Errors occurred during RECORDING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR.

View the build log or the debug log for each test

Copy link
Contributor

@SarahFrench SarahFrench left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, thanks for your PR!

The test failure reported here fails with this error:

Error: Error creating Instance: googleapi: Error 400: ConfigurablePerformance is disabled

Do you know if this is a feature that needs to be opted-into at a project level?

@yaelbarak
Copy link
Member Author

yaelbarak commented Nov 6, 2024

@SarahFrench yes, there's an experiment guarding this feature. I submitted a CL adding Terraform projects to the allowlist of the experiment, this will enable the tests to run. I'm curretnly waiting for the rollout of the experiments allowlist and once it's done I will rerun the tests.

@yaelbarak
Copy link
Member Author

/gcbrun

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes:

Diff report

Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

google provider: Diff ( 3 files changed, 380 insertions(+))
google-beta provider: Diff ( 3 files changed, 380 insertions(+))
terraform-google-conversion: Diff ( 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests analytics

Total tests: 13
Passed tests: 12
Skipped tests: 0
Affected tests: 1

Click here to see the affected service packages
  • filestore

Action taken

Found 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
  • TestAccFilestoreInstance_performanceConfig

Get to know how VCR tests work

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

🟢 Tests passed during RECORDING mode:
TestAccFilestoreInstance_performanceConfig [Debug log]

🟢 No issues found for passed tests after REPLAYING rerun.


🟢 All tests passed!

View the build log or the debug log for each test

@yaelbarak
Copy link
Member Author

@SarahFrench The Terraform projects are now allowlisted for the feature guarding experiment. I reran the tests and they're now passing.

Copy link
Contributor

@SarahFrench SarahFrench left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for resolving the testing issues!

There isn't any public documentation I can cross-reference with during review, but I'm happy to approve based on the acceptance tests

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants