-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add force_destroy
field to google_storage_managed_folder
#11303
Add force_destroy
field to google_storage_managed_folder
#11303
Conversation
Hello! I am a robot. Tests will require approval from a repository maintainer to run. @SarahFrench, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to review your changes. If you have not received review feedback within 2 business days, please leave a comment on this PR asking them to take a look. You can help make sure that review is quick by doing a self-review and by running impacted tests locally. |
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
1 similar comment
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 106 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 8 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 106 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 8 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
mmv1/third_party/terraform/services/storage/storage_managed_folder_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
Missing test reportYour PR includes resource fields which are not covered by any test. Resource: resource "google_storage_managed_folder" "primary" {
force_destroy = # value needed
}
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 106 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 106 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
Should I do something about this error? Not sure why it fails now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for updating the acceptance test! I've left some guidance about addressing the test failure and after that's solved I'm happy to merge
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 106 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 2 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for iterating on the tests with me, this looks good to merge now
This PR introduces a
force_destroy
field forgoogle_storage_managed_folder
resources.Fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#18553 which was left as a pending action from #10786 (comment)