Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New SecOps blueprints section and SecOps GKE Forwarder #2514

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

simonebruzzechesse
Copy link
Collaborator

New SecOps blueprints section.

New SecOps GKE Forwarder blueprint providing a modular and scalable solution for setting up a SecOps forwarder on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE). This forwarder is designed to handle multi-tenant data ingestion, ensuring secure and efficient log forwarding to your Chronicle instance.

I applicable, I acknowledge that I have:

  • Read the contributing guide
  • Ran terraform fmt on all modified files
  • Regenerated the relevant README.md files using tools/tfdoc.py
  • Made sure all relevant tests pass

@simonebruzzechesse simonebruzzechesse force-pushed the bruzz/secops-gke-forwarder branch from 72fbcb2 to 52d50e8 Compare August 23, 2024 15:57
@juliocc juliocc removed their request for review September 6, 2024 10:50
@simonebruzzechesse simonebruzzechesse force-pushed the bruzz/secops-gke-forwarder branch 2 times, most recently from e9230c3 to cb63c04 Compare September 13, 2024 12:48
@simonebruzzechesse simonebruzzechesse force-pushed the bruzz/secops-gke-forwarder branch 4 times, most recently from c52ec21 to 9204f75 Compare September 25, 2024 10:33
@simonebruzzechesse simonebruzzechesse force-pushed the bruzz/secops-gke-forwarder branch from 9204f75 to 220b0e8 Compare November 5, 2024 11:54
@simonebruzzechesse simonebruzzechesse merged commit 08e4d33 into master Nov 5, 2024
18 checks passed
@simonebruzzechesse simonebruzzechesse deleted the bruzz/secops-gke-forwarder branch November 5, 2024 13:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants