add option for each stripPrefix to have own replacePrefix

[cdbattags]

depends on #138 from @SignpostMarv

Building off of #138, I wanted to add functionality for each each stripPrefix to have it's own replacePrefix. The use case would be having multiple "modules" that each have their own "public" directory that are all globbed into the sw.js file.

Format for stripPrefix if you'd like the functionality is as follows:

{
  stripPrefix: [
    [strip1, replace1],
    [strip2, replace2]
  ]
}

or

{
  stripPrefix: [
    {
      strip: stripString1,
      replace: replaceString1
    },
    {
      strip: stripString2,
      replace: replaceString2
    }
  ]
}

[googlebot]

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request) and all commit authors, but as best as we can tell these commits were authored by someone else. If that's the case, please add them to this pull request and have them confirm that they're okay with these commits being contributed to Google. If we're mistaken and you did author these commits, just reply here to confirm.

[cdbattags]

Hey @SignpostMarv! Please confirm you're ok with the change and maybe we can get these both in at once.

Also, any suggestions?

[SignpostMarv]

Thinking something like this:

var stripPrefixAsObj = {
  "replaceThis": "withThat",
  "replaceThisOtherThing": "withThatOtherThing"
};
var relativeUrl = fileAndSizeAndHash.file.replace(
  new RegExp('/^(' + Object.keys(stripPrefixAsObj).map(escapeRegExp).join('|') + ')'),
  function (match) {
    return stripPrefixAsObj[match];
  }
);

[cdbattags]

Nice! I like it. I'll update my PR in a few.

[jeffposnick]

Sorry, I've been offline for a bit and am catching up on things at the moment.

Just so I understand the scope of what's in this PR, it seems like it includes everything from @SignpostMarv's #138, correct? So I can close that PR and just provide feedback on this?

[SignpostMarv]

@jeffposnick I think we're still waiting on @cdbattags to update it with the Object.keys version, although I've got time tonight to patch it as well.
@jeffposnick @cdbattags I've updated #138 to include the mapped prefix-replace object method described above.

[jeffposnick]

Thanks for the original contribution, @cdbattags.

I've merged #138, and if you want to reconcile the conflicts in your current PR and ensure all linting/tests pass, I'll be happy to merge yours.

[jeffposnick]

I'd prefer not to check this in.

[cdbattags]

Hi all! Sorry for the delay! Yeah, @jeffposnick, with the .editorconfig file I just wanted to put that out there and get a feel for why most repos are against checking one in 😳. Also, it looks like @SignpostMarv's #138 covers what I implemented, no?

[jeffposnick]

Okay, if you're happy with the implementation in #138 and feel like it covers the same ground, I'm happy to close this and will tag a new 4.0.0 release shortly. Thanks for the original contribution and for collaborating with @SignpostMarv.