-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tests(snyk): assert upper bounds #9308
Merged
Merged
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
eafb5f9
deps(snyk): do not allow * in semver
connorjclark a24a38e
assert upper bounds
connorjclark a006050
update test name
connorjclark ba9bc7c
add comment
connorjclark e01212b
Update lighthouse-core/test/audits/dobetterweb/no-vulnerable-librarie…
connorjclark 6ec1ae1
semver.Range
connorjclark 441d4f8
merge
connorjclark 55bf357
comments
connorjclark 4653ba1
update
connorjclark File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ | |
const NoVulnerableLibrariesAudit = | ||
require('../../../audits/dobetterweb/no-vulnerable-libraries.js'); | ||
const assert = require('assert'); | ||
const semver = require('semver'); | ||
|
||
/* eslint-env jest */ | ||
describe('Avoids front-end JavaScript libraries with known vulnerabilities', () => { | ||
|
@@ -99,3 +100,41 @@ describe('Avoids front-end JavaScript libraries with known vulnerabilities', () | |
assert.equal(auditResult.score, 1); | ||
}); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
// https://github.com/npm/node-semver/issues/166#issuecomment-245990039 | ||
function hasUpperBound(rangeString) { | ||
const range = new semver.Range(rangeString); | ||
if (!range) return false; | ||
|
||
// For every subset ... | ||
for (const subset of range.set) { | ||
// Upperbound exists if... | ||
|
||
// < or <= is in one of the subset's clauses (= gets normalized to >= and <). | ||
if (subset.some(comparator => comparator.operator.match(/^</))) { | ||
continue; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Subset has a prerelease tag (operator will be empty). | ||
if (subset.length === 1 && subset[0].operator === '') { | ||
continue; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// No upperbound for this subset. | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
|
||
return true; | ||
} | ||
|
||
describe('every snyk vulnerability has an upper bound', () => { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. |
||
for (const vulns of Object.values(NoVulnerableLibrariesAudit.snykDB.npm)) { | ||
for (const vuln of vulns) { | ||
for (const semver of vuln.semver.vulnerable) { | ||
if (!hasUpperBound(semver)) { | ||
assert.fail(`invalid semver: ${semver}. Must contain an upper bound`); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
}); |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure this entirely works. A
rangeString
of'*'
ends up throwing here, for instance.We have an untested homegrown solution vs a tested (by semver) but ugly
gtr
solution...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't that kinda desired behavior? :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed.
Added tests.