-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
misc: avoid splitting node labels in the middle of unicode surrogate pairs #11698
Merged
devtools-bot
merged 12 commits into
GoogleChrome:master
from
wildlyinaccurate:truncate-codepoints-not-bytes
Dec 6, 2020
+18
−1
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bb133e1
Avoid splitting node labels in the middle of unicode surrogate pairs.…
wildlyinaccurate 215d30a
Apply suggestions from code review
wildlyinaccurate a17f9e1
drop trailing space
paulirish 5de8b7b
Merge branch 'master' into truncate-codepoints-not-bytes
patrickhulce 29ef1f7
logging out this env var..
paulirish ec6b9d1
deepen fork history (attempt to fix...)
paulirish b3569b6
fixed dumb syntax err
paulirish a7fe2e8
remove these debugging statements. sorry everyone for the commit nois…
paulirish 05b02a8
hopefully fixed the git deepen magic. fingers crossed.
paulirish 694e471
Update .github/scripts/git-get-shared-history.sh
paulirish dea8e07
who doesn't love debugging in someone else's PR?
paulirish a298d42
gha's syntax for git remotes is whack.
paulirish File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@paulirish how do you feel about this skipping this check entirely if it's from a fork for now instead and we can sort out the fix later?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that works for me.. though determining that would probably have required almost this much iteration as well... so i think it's all moot.
ALL MOOT!