Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing solana network address placeholder #4836

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

kkatusic
Copy link
Collaborator

@kkatusic kkatusic commented Oct 9, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced address validation to support Solana blockchain addresses.
    • Updated input placeholder to indicate address format for Solana.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved validation logic for Solana addresses to ensure accuracy.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 9, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
giveth-dapps-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 9, 2024 11:40am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new boolean variable isSolanaChain in the AddNewAddress.tsx component to identify if the selected blockchain is Solana. This variable influences the handleAdd function, modifying the address input placeholder to 'xxxx...xxxx' for Solana addresses while retaining existing conditions for Stellar. Additionally, the validateAddress function has been updated to validate Solana addresses using the isSolanaAddress function. The overall structure of the component remains unchanged, focusing on improving address validation for the Solana blockchain.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/components/modals/ManageProjectAddresses/AddNewAddress.tsx - Added boolean variable isSolanaChain to check for Solana chain.
- Updated placeholder for address input for Solana.
- Modified validateAddress to include Solana address validation.

Poem

In the land of chains where rabbits play,
A new address blooms, bright as day.
Solana's call, a hop and a skip,
With 'xxxx...xxxx', we take a trip.
Validations dance, so swift and keen,
In our project, all is serene! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a7173e0 and becf394.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/modals/ManageProjectAddresses/AddNewAddress.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/modals/ManageProjectAddresses/AddNewAddress.tsx (3)

51-51: LGTM: Addition of isSolanaChain variable

The introduction of the isSolanaChain variable is a good addition. It's consistent with the existing isStellarChain variable and provides a clear way to check if the selected chain is Solana. This will help in implementing Solana-specific logic throughout the component.


Line range hint 101-110: LGTM: Updated validateAddress function with Solana support

The changes to the validateAddress function correctly implement Solana address validation. The new validation logic is well-integrated with the existing code, maintaining consistency in error handling and loading state management. The order of checks (Solana, Stellar, ETH) is logical, and the error message for invalid Solana addresses is clear and consistent with other error messages.


Line range hint 1-190: Overall assessment: Good implementation with minor suggestions for improvement

The changes to add Solana support to the AddNewAddress component are generally well-implemented. The new isSolanaChain variable, the updates to the validateAddress function, and the modifications to the address input placeholder all contribute to better handling of Solana addresses.

The code maintains consistency with the existing structure and follows the established patterns for handling different chain types. The only suggestion for improvement is related to the placeholder logic, which could be refactored for better readability and maintainability.

Great job on expanding the functionality of this component!

Copy link
Collaborator

@MohammadPCh MohammadPCh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kkatusic Thanks My friend, LGTM

@kkatusic kkatusic merged commit 66e0051 into develop Oct 15, 2024
3 checks passed
@kkatusic kkatusic deleted the fix/solana_input_placeholder branch October 15, 2024 13:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: QA
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants