fix: disable typing events when offline

[isekovanic]

🎯 Goal

Solves the typing errors mentioned in this GH issue.

🛠 Implementation details

🎨 UI Changes

iOS

Before	After

Android

Before	After

🧪 Testing

☑️ Checklist

• I have signed the Stream CLA (required)
• PR targets the develop branch
• Documentation is updated
• New code is tested in main example apps, including all possible scenarios
  • SampleApp iOS and Android
  • Expo iOS and Android

[Stream-SDK-Bot]

SDK Size

title	develop	branch	diff	status
js_bundle_size	444.8212890625 KB	451 KB	+6151 B	🔴

[isekovanic]

SDK Size

title develop branch diff status
js_bundle_size 444.8212890625 KB 451 KB +6151 B 🔴

Yeah this is 100% broken @khushal87 & @oliverlaz :D I think it interchangeably gets confused between our v6 branch and anything that goes to develop, since:

• This PR was just fine, without any issues
• Then, this PR was merged and it reduced the SDK size by 6KB
• Then finally this one was opened only to fail.

[oliverlaz]

SDK Size

title develop branch diff status
js_bundle_size 444.8212890625 KB 451 KB +6151 B 🔴

Yeah this is 100% broken @khushal87 & @oliverlaz :D I think it interchangeably gets confused between our v6 branch and anything that goes to develop, since:

• This PR was just fine, without any issues
• Then, this PR was merged and it reduced the SDK size by 6KB
• Then finally this one was opened only to fail.

hey @testableapple can you please shed some light here? How does this calculation work under the hood? Do we have some caches that are messing up the reporting?

[testableapple]

hey @testableapple can you please shed some light here? How does this calculation work under the hood? Do we have some caches that are messing up the reporting?

Hey @oliverlaz, well, there is no caching. There is only one json file that is being updated on every merge to develop and main accordingly.

So every PR is measured and compared with the develop value in the json file above.

In regards to this issue, @isekovanic is right, the SDK Size action gets confused because of the push to v6 branch (it only expects pushes to develop and main, which is an issue I guess). I'll fix this and open a PR in this repo shortly.

[isekovanic]

Thanks so much @testableapple ! Do you have any advice for how to approach this whenever we do branch builds ? We sometimes need to do this in order to test on Release versions of our sample apps.

[testableapple]

@isekovanic, here is the fix - #2755
When it's merged, please keep an eye on the SDK Size action in your next PR.

Do you have any advice for how to approach this whenever we do branch builds?

Hmm, I don't see how this might be related 🤔
As long as you do not push to develop or main directly, it should not be a problem.

[isekovanic]

@isekovanic, here is the fix - #2755 When it's merged, please keep an eye on the SDK Size action in your next PR.

Do you have any advice for how to approach this whenever we do branch builds?

Hmm, I don't see how this might be related 🤔 As long as you do not push to develop or main directly, it should not be a problem.

Ah, I misunderstood what you were saying - my bad. Ignore the last inquiry about branch builds 👍

[stream-ci-bot]

🎉 This PR is included in version 5.41.2 🎉

The release is available on:

• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀